Frederick W. Boal
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- James K. MitchellDavid LivingstoneStephen A. RoyleChris WilsonCeri PeachDavid LeyColin ClarkePaul A. Compton
- Topics
- Irish and British Studies (16 papers)Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandCanada
In The Last Decade
Frederick W. Boal
35 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 375
- Urban Studies 146
- Political Science and International Relations 57
- General Health Professions 54
- Economics and Econometrics 52
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Boal
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Boal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Boal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Boal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Boal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Boal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Boal. The network helps show where Frederick W. Boal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. Boal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. Boal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. Boal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. Boal. Frederick W. Boal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | The classic work: a social geography of Belfast | 1 |
| 4 | Enduring City: Belfast in the Twentieth Century | 18 |
| 5 | Ethnicity and housing : accommodating differences | 24 |
| 6 | North America : a geographical mosaic | 6 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | Them and Us? Attitudinal Variation among Belfast Churchgoers | 3 |
| 10 | Them and us? : attitudinal variation among churchgoers in Belfast | 22 |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 94 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Urban ethnic conflict : a comparative perspective | 7 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Frederick W. Boal
Frederick W. Boal is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 35 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (16 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (146 citations), Sociology and Political Science (375 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations). Frederick W. Boal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James K. Mitchell, David Livingstone, Stephen A. Royle, Chris Wilson, Ceri Peach, David Ley, Colin Clarke, Paul A. Compton, Susan Clarke and Desmond A. Gillmor. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Human Geography, Geographical Journal and Economic Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.