Frederick W. Boal
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Urban Planning and Governance 2
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 1
-
- Irish and British Studies 16
- Canadian Identity and History 1
- Anthropology top 10%
-
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
-
- Rural development and sustainability 2
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 2
Frederick W. Boal
35 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Urban Studies 146
- Sociology and Political Science 375
- Geography, Planning and Development 42
- Transportation 21
- Anthropology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Boal
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Boal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Boal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Boal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Boal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Boal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Boal. The network helps show where Frederick W. Boal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Boal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 3 | The classic work: a social geography of Belfast | 2007 | 1 |
| 4 | Enduring City: Belfast in the Twentieth Century | 2007 | 18 |
| 5 | Ethnicity and housing : accommodating differences | 2000 | 24 |
| 6 | North America : a geographical mosaic | 1999 | 6 |
| 7 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 9 | Them and Us? Attitudinal Variation among Belfast Churchgoers | 1997 | 3 |
| 10 | Them and us? : attitudinal variation among churchgoers in Belfast | 1997 | 22 |
| 11 | 1996 | 47 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 94 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 17 | Urban ethnic conflict : a comparative perspective | 1976 | 7 |
| 18 | 1970 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1965 | 15 |
About Frederick W. Boal
Frederick W. Boal is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 35 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (16 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper) and Canadian Identity and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (146 citations), Sociology and Political Science (375 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations). Frederick W. Boal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James K. Mitchell, David Livingstone, Stephen A. Royle, Chris Wilson, Ceri Peach, David Ley, Colin Clarke, Paul A. Compton, Susan Clarke and Desmond A. Gillmor. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Human Geography, Geographical Journal and Economic Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.