Frederick L. Greene

6.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 4.4k citations indexed

About

Frederick L. Greene is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick L. Greene has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 4.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Surgery, 25 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 19 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Frederick L. Greene's work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (13 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers). Frederick L. Greene is often cited by papers focused on Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (13 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers). Frederick L. Greene collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frederick L. Greene's co-authors include Leslie H. Sobin, S. Eva Singletary, Christian Wittekind, Carolyn C. Compton, Monica Morrow, Kirby I. Bland, Daniel F. Hayes, Craig Allred, Ann D. Thor and R. V. P. Hutter and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Frederick L. Greene

78 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Stagin... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 2002 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick L. Greene United States 27 1.9k 1.7k 1.2k 1.1k 646 83 4.4k
Kai Oliver Jensen Switzerland 13 1.5k 0.8× 1.4k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 715 0.7× 285 0.4× 52 4.0k
David P. Jaques United States 38 3.4k 1.8× 3.5k 2.0× 3.0k 2.4× 575 0.5× 457 0.7× 70 7.7k
Mitchell C. Posner United States 43 2.3k 1.2× 2.9k 1.7× 2.5k 2.1× 856 0.8× 370 0.6× 175 6.4k
Nabil Wasif United States 36 1.4k 0.7× 1.6k 1.0× 971 0.8× 1.0k 1.0× 725 1.1× 156 3.8k
Ben Tran Australia 14 679 0.4× 2.7k 1.6× 994 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 430 0.7× 61 4.0k
Dido Franceschi United States 36 1.8k 1.0× 1.8k 1.0× 1.9k 1.5× 460 0.4× 365 0.6× 140 4.5k
Steven L. Chen United States 30 1.5k 0.8× 1.5k 0.9× 639 0.5× 606 0.6× 416 0.6× 65 3.2k
Stefan Breitenstein Switzerland 35 3.8k 2.0× 2.7k 1.6× 1.8k 1.5× 817 0.8× 466 0.7× 114 8.0k
M K Palmer United Kingdom 24 737 0.4× 2.0k 1.2× 1.0k 0.9× 567 0.5× 537 0.8× 51 3.9k
Ulrich Güller Switzerland 46 3.6k 1.9× 1.9k 1.1× 1.2k 1.0× 859 0.8× 786 1.2× 134 6.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Greene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Greene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Greene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Greene. The network helps show where Frederick L. Greene may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick L. Greene

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick L. Greene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick L. Greene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick L. Greene. Frederick L. Greene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Greene, Frederick L.. (2020). COVID-19 Data and the Cancer Patient: A Need for Registry Inclusion. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 27(8). 2571–2572. 1 indexed citations
2.
Stefanidis, Dimitrios, et al.. (2012). Feasibility and Value of a Procedural Workshop for Surgery Residents Based on Phase II of the APDS/ACS National Skills Curriculum. Journal of surgical education. 69(6). 735–739. 14 indexed citations
3.
Funaki, Brian, Charles E. Ray, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, et al.. (2012). ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiologic Management of Hepatic Malignancy. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 9(12). 919–925. 4 indexed citations
4.
Norton, H. James, et al.. (2011). Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy in the Community-Based Setting: Can This Rate Be Used as a Benchmark for Cancer Care?. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 20(3). 427–437.
5.
Rosen, Max P., Alexander Ding, Michael A. Blake, et al.. (2011). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain—Suspected Appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 8(11). 749–755. 183 indexed citations
6.
Stefanidis, Dimitrios, Christina E. Acker, & Frederick L. Greene. (2010). Performance Goals on Simulators Boost Resident Motivation and Skills Laboratory Attendance. Journal of surgical education. 67(2). 66–70. 50 indexed citations
7.
Huprich, James E., Max P. Rosen, Jeff L. Fidler, et al.. (2010). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Crohn's Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 7(2). 94–102. 29 indexed citations
8.
Greene, Frederick L.. (2006). Staging of colon and rectal cancer: from endoscopy to molecular markers. Surgical Endoscopy. 20(S2). S475–S478. 13 indexed citations
9.
Greene, Frederick L.. (2003). TNM staging for malignancies of the digestive tract: 2003 changes and beyond. Seminars in Surgical Oncology. 21(1). 23–29. 68 indexed citations
10.
Gospodarowicz, Mary, et al.. (2003). The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer. 100(1). 1–5. 184 indexed citations
11.
Greene, Frederick L.. (2002). AJCC cancer staging handbook : from the AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer eBooks. 543 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Wittekind, Christian, Carolyn C. Compton, Frederick L. Greene, & Leslie H. Sobin. (2002). TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer. 94(9). 2511–2516. 365 indexed citations
13.
Matthews, Brent D., Edith D. Box, Charles L Backus, et al.. (2002). Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia. 6(1). 17–20. 22 indexed citations
14.
Heniford, B. Todd, et al.. (2001). Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 181(3). 226–230. 34 indexed citations
15.
Heniford, B. Todd, Brent D. Matthews, Ronald F. Sing, et al.. (2001). Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surgical Endoscopy. 15(8). 799–801. 230 indexed citations
16.
Greene, Frederick L.. (1997). Laparoscopic maneuvers in the presence of ascites. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 65(2). 141–142. 1 indexed citations
17.
Coker, Ann L., et al.. (1993). Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in Indonesia. Contraception. 47(3). 241–249. 5 indexed citations
18.
Greene, Frederick L.. (1989). Surgical Ethics–1980s and Beyond. Southern Medical Journal. 82(10). 1262–1264. 1 indexed citations
19.
Greene, Frederick L., et al.. (1988). Comparison of a Totally Implantable Access Device for Chemotherapy (Port-A-Cath) and Long-term Percutaneous Catheterization (Broviac)*. Southern Medical Journal. 81(5). 580–583. 55 indexed citations
20.
Leis, Henry P., et al.. (1988). Nipple Discharge: Surgical Significance. Southern Medical Journal. 81(1). 20–26. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026