Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics
This map shows the geographic impact of William Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Moore more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Moore. The network helps show where William Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Moore.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Moore based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Moore. William Moore is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Moore, William, et al.. (2006). Peer Reviewed: Body Mass Index and Blood Pressure Screening in a Rural Public School System: the Healthy Kids Project. Preventing Chronic Disease. 3(4).2 indexed citations
4.
Zuna, Rosemary E., R Allen, William Moore, et al.. (2005). Dermatopathology. Laboratory Investigation. 85. 82–88.2 indexed citations
Thompson, Mark A., Ralph A. Vernacchia, & William Moore. (1998). Case studies in applied sport psychology : an educational approach.7 indexed citations
7.
Moore, William, et al.. (1997). Required Service Learning: The Ultimate Expression of Outreach. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 2(1).1 indexed citations
8.
Moore, William. (1996). MBAs: are they worth the paper they're printed on? Training for doctors. Method in the madness.. PubMed. 106(5492). suppl 17–8, 21.1 indexed citations
9.
Dryden, Michael W., Alberto B. Broce, & William Moore. (1993). Severe flea infestation in dairy calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 203(10). 1448–1452.23 indexed citations
Moore, William & Lillian V. Holdeman. (1975). Discussion of Current Bacteriological Investigations of the Relationships between Instestinal Flora, Diet, and Colon Cancer. Cancer Research. 35. 3418–3420.132 indexed citations
14.
Anderson, Neil V., et al.. (1973). Cutaneous sporotrichosis in a cat: a case report. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 9(6). 526–529.7 indexed citations
Osbaldiston, G. W. & William Moore. (1971). Renal Function Tests in Cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 159(3). 292–301.21 indexed citations
Elkan, Gerald H. & William Moore. (1960). The effects of temperature, moisture, and initial levels of organic matter upon differential microbial counts, CO 5. activity and organic matter decomposition in soil.. 76(1). 134–140.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.