Frederick L. Campbell
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Brenda D. TownesLee Roy BeachR. N. ClarkJohn C. HendeeMurray A. StrausRonald L. AkersBarbara F. ReskinDonald C. Martin
- Topics
- Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers)Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers)Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Frederick L. Campbell
18 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 173
- Social Psychology 139
- Demography 130
- Gender Studies 95
- General Health Professions 72
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Campbell
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Campbell. The network helps show where Frederick L. Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick L. Campbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick L. Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick L. Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick L. Campbell. Frederick L. Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | How the Bureau of Land Management designates and protects Areas of Critical Environment Concern: A status report, with a critical review by the Natural Resources Defense Council. | 2 |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 72 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 70 |
About Frederick L. Campbell
Frederick L. Campbell is a scholar working on Demography, Reproductive Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Demography (130 citations) and Gender Studies (95 citations). Frederick L. Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brenda D. Townes, Lee Roy Beach, R. N. Clark, John C. Hendee, Murray A. Straus, Ronald L. Akers, Barbara F. Reskin, Donald C. Martin, H. M. Blalock and Shulamit Reinharz. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.