Frederick Johnson

55 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Frederick Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Developmental Biology 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 136
  • Space and Planetary Science 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 23
Replace G Pilleri with:
G Pilleri Switzerland
Thomas McLaughlin United States
Edward S. Halas United States
Keith Sudheimer United States
Michael Turton United Kingdom
Mary Pickford United Kingdom
Nektaria Nicolakakis Canada
Alan H. Harris United States
Hideki Nakano Japan
F. Gómez Spain
Frederick Johnson relative to G Pilleri Switzerland G Pilleri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
G Pilleri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Johnson. The network helps show where Frederick Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200785
2 197960
3 196755
4 196741
5 197239
6 197237
7 197232
8 198423
9 197621
10
Investigations in Southwest Yukon: Geobotanical and Archaeological Reconnaissance
196421
11 196920
12 201218
13 198914
14 198313
15 197911
16 195611
17
The influence of intensity of colour on perceived flavour characteristics.
198710
18 195110
19 19769
20 19668

About Frederick Johnson

Frederick Johnson is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Space and Planetary Science, Anthropology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Paleontology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (20 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (136 citations), Space and Planetary Science (10 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (122 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations). Frederick Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. Sharp, Ibolja Černak, Robert Vink, Norma Boone Goldberg, Hugh M. Raup, A. Amdisen, Osceola Whitney, Giuseppe Nappi, M. T. Ross and Richard Foster Flint. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, American Antiquity, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026