Frederick J. Cox
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Papers in
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
-
- Ion-surface interactions and analysis 3
- Co-authors
- Murray V. Johnston (5 shared papers)Myoseon Jang (1 shared paper)Michael P. Tolocka (1 shared paper)Joy M. Ginter (1 shared paper)Richard M. Kamens (1 shared paper)Arnab Dasgupta (1 shared paper)Kuangnan Qian (2 shared papers)Abhimanyu O. Patil (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2 papers)Macromolecules (1 paper)Environmental Science & Technology (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick J. Cox
6 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Atmospheric Science 408
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 283
- Environmental Engineering 80
- Global and Planetary Change 91
- Process Chemistry and Technology 11
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Cox. The network helps show where Frederick J. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 421 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1954 | 1 |
About Frederick J. Cox
Frederick J. Cox is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Computational Mechanics, Analytical Chemistry, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (1 paper), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper) and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (408 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (283 citations), Environmental Engineering (80 citations), Global and Planetary Change (91 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (11 citations). Frederick J. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Murray V. Johnston, Myoseon Jang, Michael P. Tolocka, Joy M. Ginter, Richard M. Kamens, Arnab Dasgupta, Kuangnan Qian, Abhimanyu O. Patil, Dennis G. Peiffer and Charles N. McEwen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Macromolecules, Environmental Science & Technology, The American Historical Review and Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.