Frederick G. Meyer
- Horticulture top 10%
- Space and Planetary Science top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
-
- Plant and animal studies 6
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 5
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 4
- Paleontology top 10%
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 7
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 7
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 2
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 2
-
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 2
- Co-authors
- Alan W. MeerowAlbrecht ClassenJames W. HardinJisaburo OhwiD. A. RosenbergerJan WoudstraRudolf Schmid
- Journals
- Taxon (4 papers)Economic Botany (2 papers)Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Frederick G. Meyer
22 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Horticulture 17
- Space and Planetary Science 11
- Archeology 66
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 117
- Paleontology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick G. Meyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick G. Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick G. Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick G. Meyer. The network helps show where Frederick G. Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Frederick G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The natural history of Pompeii | 2002 | 112 |
| 2 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 4 | The Great Herbal of Leonhart Fuchs: De historia stirpium commentarii insignes, 1542 | 1999 | 16 |
| 5 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 43 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 27 | |
| 13 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1966 | 1 | |
| 15 | Flora of Japan | 1965 | 37 |
| 16 | 1965 | 63 | |
| 17 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 28 |
About Frederick G. Meyer
Frederick G. Meyer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Classics, Endocrinology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (5 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (4 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (17 citations), Space and Planetary Science (11 citations), Archeology (66 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (117 citations) and Paleontology (42 citations). Frederick G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Alan W. Meerow, Albrecht Classen, James W. Hardin, Jisaburo Ohwi, D. A. Rosenberger, Jan Woudstra and Rudolf Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Taxon, Economic Botany, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, German Studies Review and Brittonia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.