Frederick Ehrlich

21 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Frederick Ehrlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 234
  • Clinical Psychology 180
  • General Health Professions 149
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 107
Replace Janet Fricke with:
Janet Fricke Australia
Daniel E. Rodell United States
Emmanuel Chiebuka Okoye Nigeria
Eline Thornquist Norway
Carolyn Lemsky Canada
Janice L. Palmer United States
Kathleen T. Lucke United States
Den‐Ching A. Lee Australia
Jennifer Fleming Australia
Judy Robison United Kingdom
Frederick Ehrlich relative to Janet Fricke Australia Janet Fricke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Janet Fricke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Ehrlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Ehrlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Ehrlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Ehrlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Ehrlich. The network helps show where Frederick Ehrlich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Ehrlich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Ehrlich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Ehrlich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Ehrlich. Frederick Ehrlich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 51
2 58
3 1
4 4
5 2
6
Stress in carers of the elderly. A controlled study of patients attending a Sydney family medical practice.
5
7 4
8 8
9 92
10 1
11
Maintaining quality of aged care in institutions: from structure to outcome.
1
12 2
13 15
14 221
15 2
16 1
17 5
18 2
19 1
20 2

About Frederick Ehrlich

Frederick Ehrlich is a scholar working on General Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (107 citations), Rehabilitation (106 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (234 citations). Frederick Ehrlich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Brian Draper, Christopher J. Poulos, Roslyn G. Poulos, Andrew Cole, Stephen R. Lord, Georgina Luscombe, Henry Brodaty, Leonard Solomon and Eric A. J. Hoste. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Traumatic Stress and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026