Frederick E. Lepore
- Neurology top 2%
- Neurology and Historical Studies 7
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 6
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 6
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 4
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology and Historical Studies 7
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 6
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 6
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 4
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 8
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 18
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 4
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Roger C. DuvoisinWilliam J. NicklasSudhansu ChokrovertyLawrence I. GolbeJ. I. SagePatricia H. DavisDean FalkGeorge E. Sanborn
- Cited by
- NeurologyOphthalmology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Frederick E. Lepore
44 papers receiving 912 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Neurology 534
- Neurology 184
- Ophthalmology 180
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 278
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Lepore
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Lepore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Lepore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Lepore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Lepore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Lepore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Lepore. The network helps show where Frederick E. Lepore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Lepore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 4 | And the Blind Shall Hear: Improved Pitch Discrimination in the Early Blind | 2004 | 5 |
| 5 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 46 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 52 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 25 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 5 |
About Frederick E. Lepore
Frederick E. Lepore is a scholar working on Neurology, Ophthalmology and Neurology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (18 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (7 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (4 papers) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (534 citations), Neurology (184 citations) and Ophthalmology (180 citations). Frederick E. Lepore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roger C. Duvoisin, William J. Nicklas, Sudhansu Chokroverty, Lawrence I. Golbe, J. I. Sage, Patricia H. Davis, Lawrence I. Golbe, Dean Falk, George E. Sanborn and John T. Slevin. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, NeuroImage, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Clinical Neuropharmacology and Movement Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.