Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

2.6k papers and 63.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 63.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (1.9k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k papers) and Epidemiology (408 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (769 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (638 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (570 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology are Carol L. Shields, Gregor Wollensak, Jerry A. Shields, Natalie A. Afshari, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed, K.M. Hammersmith, Steven J. Gedde, Muthiah Srinivasan, Gary C. Brown and Douglas R. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025