Frederick Bloom

67 papers receiving 979 citations

Peers

Frederick Bloom
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Mathematics 271
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 290
  • Modeling and Simulation 84
  • Control and Systems Engineering 327
  • Numerical Analysis 76
Replace Franck Boyer with:
Franck Boyer France
G. D. Gupta United States
Giuseppe Geymonat France
Michel Frémond Italy
Roger Van Keer Belgium
B. Mena Mexico
P. Puri United States
C. Verdi Italy
Dongming Wei United States
Frederick Bloom relative to Franck Boyer France Franck Boyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Franck Boyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Bloom. The network helps show where Frederick Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Bloom Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Bloom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000126
2 1994110
3 198065
4 199956
5 200255
6 198153
7 200053
8 199252
9 200249
10 200143
11 200141
12 199729
13 199529
14 195524
15 196920
16 197920
17 199919
18 199514
19 200513
20 199911

About Frederick Bloom

Frederick Bloom is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (24 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (23 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (9 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (9 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (8 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (8 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (7 papers) and Navier-Stokes equation solutions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (271 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (290 citations), Modeling and Simulation (84 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (327 citations) and Numerical Analysis (76 citations). Frederick Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Coffin, Hamid Bellout, Theodore J. Heindel, Jindřich Nečas, Timothy Patterson, Edward B. Brown, Xiaodong Wang and J. Nečas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Nonlinear Analysis, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, International Journal of Engineering Science and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact