Frederick B. Churchill

785 citations
24 papers · 406 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers)History of Science and Natural History (2 papers)Medical History and Innovations (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Frederick B. Churchill

23 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Frederick B. Churchill
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • History and Philosophy of Science 178
  • Molecular Biology 81
  • Genetics 77
  • History 52
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 44
Replace Keith R. Benson with:
Keith R. Benson United States
Lynn K. Nyhart United States
Toby Α. Appel United States
Adrian Desmond United Kingdom
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis United States
Uwe Hoßfeld Germany
Gregory Radick United Kingdom
Ronald Rainger United States
Daniel P. Todes United States
Georgy S. Levit Germany
Frederick B. Churchill relative to Keith R. Benson United States Keith R. Benson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Keith R. Benson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick B. Churchill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick B. Churchill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick B. Churchill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick B. Churchill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick B. Churchill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick B. Churchill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick B. Churchill. The network helps show where Frederick B. Churchill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick B. Churchill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick B. Churchill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick B. Churchill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick B. Churchill. Frederick B. Churchill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2
Shifting the Boundaries of Moral Behavior : The Case of Alfred Kinsey
0
3 28
4 1
5 10
6 24
7 3
8 13
9 19
10 34
11 43
12 32
13 3
14 6
15 8
16 1
17 49
18 27
19 20
20 36

About Frederick B. Churchill

Frederick B. Churchill is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Microbiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (178 citations), General Psychology (12 citations) and History (52 citations). Frederick B. Churchill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Russell, John Langdon Brooks, Jacques Roger, Keith R. Benson, Robert J. Ellrich and Peter J. Bowler. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The American Historical Review and The Quarterly Review of Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026