Daniel P. Todes

868 citations
17 papers · 388 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
    • Philosophy and History of Science
    • History of Science and Natural History
    • Evolution and Science Education
    • History of Science and Medicine

Papers in

Daniel P. Todes

16 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Daniel P. Todes
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • General Psychology 37
  • History and Philosophy of Science 112
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • History 48
  • Neurology 26
Replace Philip J. Pauly with:
Philip J. Pauly United States
Martin S. Staum Canada
Gregory Radick United Kingdom
Frederick B. Churchill United States
Iwan Rhys Morus United Kingdom
Fernando Vidal Germany
Michael Hagner Germany
Nils Roll‐Hansen Norway
Edmund Ramsden United Kingdom
Claude Blanckaert France
Daniel P. Todes relative to Philip J. Pauly United States Philip J. Pauly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip J. Pauly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Todes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Todes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Todes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Todes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Todes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Todes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Todes. The network helps show where Daniel P. Todes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. Todes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. Todes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. Todes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 20098
3 20091
4 200249
5 200117
6
Ivan Pavlov: Exploring the Animal Machine
200014
7 199743
8 199713
9 19973
10 199460
11 19944
12 199272
13 199115
14 19912
15 199055
16 198727
17
From Radicalism to scientific convention : biological psychology in Russia from Sechenov to Pavlov
19815

About Daniel P. Todes

Daniel P. Todes is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, History, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (2 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Economic Development and Digital Transformation (2 papers) and Alexander von Humboldt Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (37 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (112 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), History (48 citations) and Neurology (26 citations). Daniel P. Todes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Loren R. Graham, Rudolf Schmid, Nikolai Krementsov and Alexander Vucinich. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Isis, American Psychologist, The Russian Review and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026