Frederic R. Fairfield

442 total citations
9 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

Frederic R. Fairfield is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmaceutical Science and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederic R. Fairfield has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Pharmaceutical Science and 1 paper in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Frederic R. Fairfield's work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (2 papers) and Diffusion and Search Dynamics (2 papers). Frederic R. Fairfield is often cited by papers focused on Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (2 papers) and Diffusion and Search Dynamics (2 papers). Frederic R. Fairfield collaborates with scholars based in United States. Frederic R. Fairfield's co-authors include Peter H. von Hippel, E. B. Shera, Alonso Castro, William R. Bauer, Melvin V. Simpson, John W. Newport, Franklin W. Stahl, Ichizo Kobayashi, Mary M. Stahl and Joseph J. Lucas and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Frederic R. Fairfield

9 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederic R. Fairfield United States 8 281 81 68 36 26 9 367
Francesco Pedone Italy 13 285 1.0× 56 0.7× 26 0.4× 30 0.8× 7 0.3× 39 360
Ian Farrell United States 8 336 1.2× 48 0.6× 89 1.3× 31 0.9× 25 1.0× 9 418
Barbara H. Pheiffer United States 11 651 2.3× 50 0.6× 83 1.2× 105 2.9× 14 0.5× 13 732
Thomas Wacker Germany 10 352 1.3× 51 0.6× 127 1.9× 60 1.7× 27 1.0× 14 467
Frédéric Geinguenaud France 13 268 1.0× 43 0.5× 80 1.2× 51 1.4× 22 0.8× 26 453
Jean‐Luc Ranck France 9 390 1.4× 34 0.4× 28 0.4× 20 0.6× 21 0.8× 14 486
Harry P. Rappaport United States 9 247 0.9× 37 0.5× 43 0.6× 23 0.6× 5 0.2× 20 348
C.L. Barnes United Kingdom 7 196 0.7× 19 0.2× 43 0.6× 20 0.6× 10 0.4× 13 298
J. A. Harpst United States 14 325 1.2× 68 0.8× 120 1.8× 71 2.0× 3 0.1× 17 433
Jean Leroy France 7 561 2.0× 26 0.3× 20 0.3× 65 1.8× 15 0.6× 13 595

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic R. Fairfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic R. Fairfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic R. Fairfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic R. Fairfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic R. Fairfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic R. Fairfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic R. Fairfield. The network helps show where Frederic R. Fairfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic R. Fairfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic R. Fairfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic R. Fairfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic R. Fairfield. Frederic R. Fairfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Hippel, Peter H. von, et al.. (1994). On the Processivity of Polymerasesa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 726(1). 118–131. 73 indexed citations
2.
Castro, Alonso, Frederic R. Fairfield, & E. B. Shera. (1993). Fluorescence detection and size measurement of single DNA molecules. Analytical Chemistry. 65(7). 849–852. 99 indexed citations
3.
Davis, Lloyd M., Frederic R. Fairfield, James H. Jett, et al.. (1991). Rapid DNA sequencing based upon single molecule detection. Genetic Analysis Biomolecular Engineering. 8(1). 1–7. 43 indexed citations
4.
Hippel, Peter H. von & Frederic R. Fairfield. (1985). Thermodynamic aspects of the regulation of protein synthesis in bacteria. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 57(1). 45–56. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fairfield, Frederic R., William R. Bauer, & Melvin V. Simpson. (1985). Studies on mitochondrial type I topoisomerase and on its function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression. 824(1). 45–57. 23 indexed citations
6.
Kobayashi, Ichizo, Mary M. Stahl, Frederic R. Fairfield, & Franklin W. Stahl. (1984). COUPLING WITH PACKAGING EXPLAINS APPARENT NONRECIPROCALITY OF CHI-STIMULATED RECOMBINATION OF BACTERIOPHAGE LAMBDA BY RECA AND RECBC FUNCTIONS. Genetics. 108(4). 773–794. 25 indexed citations
7.
Fairfield, Frederic R., et al.. (1983). On the Processivity of DNA Replication. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 1(3). 715–727. 44 indexed citations
8.
Fairfield, Frederic R., et al.. (1981). A staining procedure for identifying viable cell hybrids constructed by somatic cell fusion, cybridization, or nuclear transplantation. Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics. 7(3). 321–329. 12 indexed citations
9.
Fairfield, Frederic R., William R. Bauer, & Melvin V. Simpson. (1979). Mitochondria contain a distinct DNA topoisomerase.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 254(19). 9352–9354. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026