Frédéric Danion

2.9k citations
68 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 24

Frédéric Danion

66 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Frédéric Danion
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 619
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 306
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.3k
  • Social Psychology 386
Replace John J. Buchanan with:
John J. Buchanan United States
Jae Kun Shim United States
Natalia Dounskaia United States
R. Roll France
Jean Blouin France
Gelsy Torres‐Oviedo United States
Edith Ribot‐Ciscar France
Jeremy D. Wong Canada
Les G. Carlton United States
Anne Kavounoudias France
Frédéric Danion relative to John J. Buchanan United States John J. Buchanan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
John J. Buchanan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Danion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Danion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Danion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Danion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Danion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Danion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Danion. The network helps show where Frédéric Danion may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Danion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Danion Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Danion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20245
3 20245
4 20232
5 20231
6 20203
7 202021
8 201617
9 20131
10 20089
11 200810
12 200746
13 200426
14 2003128
15 200370
16 200310
17 2002114
18 200212
19 2001188
20 200143

About Frédéric Danion

Frédéric Danion is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (55 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (38 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (16 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (15 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (7 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (619 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (306 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.3k citations) and Social Psychology (386 citations). Frédéric Danion has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark L. Latash, Gregor Schöner, Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky, John Scholz, John P. Scholz, Jean Pailhous, Vincent Nougier, Nicolas Vuillerme, M. Bonnard and Fabrice R. Sarlegna. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Experimental Brain Research, eNeuro, Journal of Neuroscience and Gait & Posture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026