John Scholz
Impact in
-
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Motor Control and Adaptation
Papers in
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 7
- Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics 1
-
- Motor Control and Adaptation 6
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Gregor Schöner (6 shared papers)Mark L. Latash (5 shared papers)Frédéric Danion (3 shared papers)Irene S. Davis (1 shared paper)Brian Noehren (1 shared paper)Katherine S. Rudolph (2 shared papers)Mindy F. Levin (1 shared paper)Darcy S. Reisman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Brain Research (3 papers)Motor Control (1 paper)British Journal of Sports Medicine (1 paper)Infant Behavior and Development (1 paper)Gait & Posture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
John Scholz
10 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 239
- Cognitive Neuroscience 541
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 154
- Rehabilitation 115
- Biomedical Engineering 773
Countries citing papers authored by John Scholz
This map shows the geographic impact of John Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Scholz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Scholz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Scholz. The network helps show where John Scholz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside John Scholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 254 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 242 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 155 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 139 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 115 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 85 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 76 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 70 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 8 |
About John Scholz
John Scholz is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rheumatology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (7 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (1 paper) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (239 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (541 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (154 citations), Rehabilitation (115 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (773 citations). John Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Gregor Schöner, Mark L. Latash, Frédéric Danion, Irene S. Davis, Brian Noehren, Katherine S. Rudolph, Mindy F. Levin, Darcy S. Reisman, Vijaya Krishnamoorthy and Abbas Fattah. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Motor Control, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Infant Behavior and Development and Gait & Posture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.