Edith Ribot‐Ciscar

2.1k total citations
49 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Edith Ribot‐Ciscar is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Edith Ribot‐Ciscar has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 29 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Edith Ribot‐Ciscar's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (27 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (22 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (20 papers). Edith Ribot‐Ciscar is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (27 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (22 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (20 papers). Edith Ribot‐Ciscar collaborates with scholars based in France, Sweden and Canada. Edith Ribot‐Ciscar's co-authors include Jean‐Pierre Roll, Mikael Bergenheim, Christiane Rossi-Durand, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, Jean‐Pierre Roll, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, J.P. Vedel, J. P. Roll, Jane E. Butler and Rochelle Ackerley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Edith Ribot‐Ciscar

49 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edith Ribot‐Ciscar France 23 814 679 347 245 232 49 1.5k
Kurt W. Kornatz United States 11 846 1.0× 1.1k 1.6× 296 0.9× 247 1.0× 121 0.5× 19 1.4k
Warren G. Darling United States 32 1.4k 1.7× 966 1.4× 369 1.1× 214 0.9× 231 1.0× 99 2.9k
Peter B. C. Matthews United States 27 915 1.1× 763 1.1× 217 0.6× 156 0.6× 193 0.8× 42 2.4k
Sophie J. De Serres Canada 17 470 0.6× 583 0.9× 175 0.5× 219 0.9× 114 0.5× 21 1.4k
Stanisław Solnik United States 17 528 0.6× 781 1.2× 253 0.7× 344 1.4× 87 0.4× 30 1.2k
О. В. Казенников Russia 17 815 1.0× 425 0.6× 138 0.4× 261 1.1× 147 0.6× 62 1.3k
Leah R. Bent Canada 24 608 0.7× 650 1.0× 543 1.6× 530 2.2× 100 0.4× 82 1.9k
Bénédicte Schepens Belgium 16 443 0.5× 668 1.0× 259 0.7× 414 1.7× 102 0.4× 47 1.5k
J.P. Vedel France 9 1.1k 1.3× 742 1.1× 606 1.7× 394 1.6× 346 1.5× 10 1.9k
Michael G. Lacourse United States 12 594 0.7× 291 0.4× 393 1.1× 132 0.5× 246 1.1× 16 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Ribot‐Ciscar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Ribot‐Ciscar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Ribot‐Ciscar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Ribot‐Ciscar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Ribot‐Ciscar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Ribot‐Ciscar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Ribot‐Ciscar. The network helps show where Edith Ribot‐Ciscar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Ribot‐Ciscar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Ribot‐Ciscar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Ribot‐Ciscar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Ribot‐Ciscar. Edith Ribot‐Ciscar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, et al.. (2024). Relations between tactile sensitivity of the finger, arm, and cheek skin over the lifespan showing decline only on the finger. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 16. 1387136–1387136. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gilbert, Laura, et al.. (2023). Applying cosmetic oil with added aromatic compounds improves tactile sensitivity and skin properties. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 10550–10550. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, Rochelle Ackerley, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, et al.. (2020). Large Postural Sways Prevent Foot Tactile Information From Fading: Neurophysiological Evidence. Cerebral Cortex Communications. 2(1). tgaa094–tgaa094. 12 indexed citations
4.
Ackerley, Rochelle, Marie Chancel, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, Edith Ribot‐Ciscar, & Anne Kavounoudias. (2019). Seeing Your Foot Move Changes Muscle Proprioceptive Feedback. eNeuro. 6(2). ENEURO.0341–18.2019. 11 indexed citations
5.
Aimonetti, Jean‐Marc, et al.. (2019). Long Term Cosmetic Application Improves Tactile Discrimination in the Elderly; a New Psychophysical Approach. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 11. 164–164. 8 indexed citations
6.
Ackerley, Rochelle, et al.. (2018). Emotions can alter kinesthetic acuity. Neuroscience Letters. 694. 99–103. 5 indexed citations
7.
Osorio, Nancy, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, Edith Ribot‐Ciscar, et al.. (2017). Merkel Cells Sense Cooling with TRPM8 Channels. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 138(4). 946–956. 15 indexed citations
8.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, Jean‐Marc Aimonetti, & Jean‐Philippe Azulay. (2017). Sensory training with vibration-induced kinesthetic illusions improves proprioceptive integration in patients with Parkinson's disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 383. 161–165. 3 indexed citations
9.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, et al.. (2013). Noise-enhanced kinaesthesia: a psychophysical and microneurographic study. Experimental Brain Research. 228(4). 503–511. 24 indexed citations
10.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, et al.. (2008). Fusimotor Drive May Adjust Muscle Spindle Feedback to Task Requirements in Humans. Journal of Neurophysiology. 101(2). 633–640. 50 indexed citations
11.
Aimonetti, Jean‐Marc, et al.. (2007). Changes in Human Muscle Spindle Sensitivity during a Proprioceptive Attention Task. Journal of Neuroscience. 27(19). 5172–5178. 69 indexed citations
12.
Aimonetti, Jean‐Marc, et al.. (2007). Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements. The Journal of Physiology. 580(2). 649–658. 96 indexed citations
13.
Bergenheim, Mikael, et al.. (2006). The Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when returned to the subject via muscle tendon vibration. Experimental Brain Research. 172(2). 163–174. 60 indexed citations
14.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, et al.. (2005). Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing. Experimental Brain Research. 164(2). 242–249. 18 indexed citations
15.
Roll, Jean‐Pierre, et al.. (2004). ?Proprioceptive signature? of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding. Experimental Brain Research. 157(3). 359–68. 28 indexed citations
16.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, et al.. (2003). Facilitation of triceps brachii muscle contraction by tendon vibration after chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Journal of Applied Physiology. 94(6). 2358–2367. 41 indexed citations
17.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, Mikael Bergenheim, & Jean‐Pierre Roll. (2002). The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans. Experimental Brain Research. 145(4). 429–436. 21 indexed citations
18.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, Christiane Rossi-Durand, & Jean‐Pierre Roll. (2000). Increased muscle spindle sensitivity to movement during reinforcement manoeuvres in relaxed human subjects. The Journal of Physiology. 523(1). 271–282. 97 indexed citations
19.
Bergenheim, Mikael, Edith Ribot‐Ciscar, & Jean‐Pierre Roll. (2000). Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: I. Muscle spindle feedback during spatially oriented movements. Experimental Brain Research. 134(3). 301–310. 87 indexed citations
20.
Ribot‐Ciscar, Edith, Marie-Françoise Tardy-Gervet, J.P. Vedel, & Jean‐Pierre Roll. (1991). Post-contraction changes in human muscle spindle resting discharge and stretch sensitivity. Experimental Brain Research. 86(3). 673–8. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kurt W. Kornatz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Warren G. Darling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter B. C. Matthews Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophie J. De Serres Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stanisław Solnik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by О. В. Казенников Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leah R. Bent Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bénédicte Schepens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J.P. Vedel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael G. Lacourse
Rankless by CCL
2026