Frédéric C. Lane
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 0.5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Raymond de RooverBrian PullanFrédéric MauroReinhold C. MuellerOliver C. CoxDavid B. TylerBenjamin G. KohlDaniel Waley
- Topics
- Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (9 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryAnthropology
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryThe Economic History Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frédéric C. Lane
43 papers receiving 561 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Economics and Econometrics 289
- Political Science and International Relations 189
- Sociology and Political Science 185
- History 145
- Anthropology 131
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric C. Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric C. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric C. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric C. Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric C. Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric C. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric C. Lane. The network helps show where Frédéric C. Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric C. Lane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric C. Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric C. Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric C. Lane. Frédéric C. Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Economía Política del Crecimiento. Cadenas causales y mecanismos institucionales | 1 |
| 4 | Storia di Venezia | 8 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Venise : une république maritime | 2 |
| 7 | Coins and moneys of account | 4 |
| 8 | Double Entry Bookkeeping and Resident Merchants. | 16 |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Frédéric C. Lane
Frédéric C. Lane is a scholar working on Classics, Archeology and History, having authored 53 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (9 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (53 citations), History (145 citations) and Anthropology (131 citations). Frédéric C. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Raymond de Roover, Brian Pullan, Frédéric Mauro, Reinhold C. Mueller, Oliver C. Cox, David B. Tyler, Benjamin G. Kohl, Daniel Waley, Robert Sabatino Lopez and Lionel Casson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The Economic History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.