Frederic C. Craigie
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- John S. LyonsDavid B. LarsonSusan S LarsonSamuel B. ThielmanRichard HobbsSiang‐Yang TanSteven M. RossDana E. King
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers)Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Frederic C. Craigie
10 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Health 239
- Sociology and Political Science 124
- Clinical Psychology 109
- Social Psychology 61
- General Health Professions 58
Countries citing papers authored by Frederic C. Craigie
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic C. Craigie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic C. Craigie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic C. Craigie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic C. Craigie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic C. Craigie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic C. Craigie. The network helps show where Frederic C. Craigie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic C. Craigie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic C. Craigie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic C. Craigie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic C. Craigie. Frederic C. Craigie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Publish without Perishing | 1 |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | The spirit and work: observations about spirituality and organizational life | 10 |
| 4 | Spiritual perspectives and practices of family physicians with an expressed interest in spirituality. | 22 |
| 5 | Weaving spirituality into organizational life. Suggestions for processes and programs. | 8 |
| 6 | 198 | |
| 7 | Conducting family meetings in nursing homes: resident, nurse, and family perceptions. | 3 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Therapeutic homework: the use of behavioral assignments in office counseling. | 4 |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 0 |
About Frederic C. Craigie
Frederic C. Craigie is a scholar working on Health, Religious studies and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (239 citations), Clinical Psychology (109 citations) and Social Psychology (61 citations). Frederic C. Craigie has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include John S. Lyons, David B. Larson, Susan S Larson, Samuel B. Thielman, Richard Hobbs, Siang‐Yang Tan, Steven M. Ross, Dana E. King, Gowri Anandarajah and Robert L. Hatch. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Academic Medicine and Behavior Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.