Frank Stowell

34 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

Frank Stowell
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Management Science and Operations Research 113
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
  • Management Information Systems 82
  • Artificial Intelligence 50
  • Information Systems 48
Replace Michael Sherwood‐Smith with:
Michael Sherwood‐Smith Ireland
Xiangbin Yan China
Tony Moynihan Ireland
Mochen Yang United States
Hauke Fuehres Germany
Craig W. Fisher United States
Fritz H. Grupe United States
Hossein Seif Zadeh Australia
Van-Hau Trieu Australia
Pei-yu Chen United States
Frank Stowell relative to Michael Sherwood‐Smith Ireland Michael Sherwood‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Michael Sherwood‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Stowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Stowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Stowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Stowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Stowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Stowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Stowell. The network helps show where Frank Stowell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Stowell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Stowell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Stowell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Stowell. Frank Stowell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 2
5 8
6 8
7 3
8 6
9 7
10 1
11 4
12 24
13
The Manager's Guide to Systems Practice: Making Sense of Complex Problems
7
14 7
15
Client Led Information System Creation
1
16
Client-Led Design: A Systemic Approach to Information System Definition
32
17 4
18 1
19
Implications of advances in information technology and the changing role of the systems analyst
1
20 0

About Frank Stowell

Frank Stowell is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 37 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (16 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (13 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (82 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (113 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (33 citations). Frank Stowell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John Mingers, Daune West, Alan O’Callaghan, Christine Welch, Mark Stansfield, Peter Bednár, David W. West and Vasilios Katos. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Information Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and European Journal of Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026