Frank N. Pieke

2.0k citations
53 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

Frank N. Pieke

48 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers

Frank N. Pieke
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 781
  • Political Science and International Relations 378
  • Demography 228
  • Anthropology 138
  • Cultural Studies 69
Replace Victoria Bernal with:
Victoria Bernal United States
Pál Nyíri Netherlands
Paul Tiyambe Železa United States
Leo Suryadinata Singapore
Alastair Davidson Australia
Denis Pahl
Eric Hershberg United States
James G. Kellas United Kingdom
Syed Farid Alatas Singapore
Elaine Lynn‐Ee Ho Singapore
Frank N. Pieke relative to Victoria Bernal United States Victoria Bernal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Victoria Bernal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank N. Pieke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank N. Pieke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank N. Pieke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank N. Pieke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank N. Pieke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank N. Pieke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank N. Pieke. The network helps show where Frank N. Pieke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank N. Pieke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank N. Pieke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank N. Pieke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank N. Pieke. Frank N. Pieke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 16
4 16
5 7
6
Legality and Labor : Chinese Migratory Workers in Great Britain
2
7
China's Immigrant Population
1
8
Legality and labour: Chinese migration, neoliberalism and the state in the UK and China
10
9 15
10 7
11
Chinese Globalization and Migration to Europe
8
12
The UK diaspora contribution to development and poverty reduction
1
13 35
14 22
15 28
16 179
17 4
18 13
19 8
20
De Chinese gemeenschap in verstarring
1

About Frank N. Pieke

Frank N. Pieke is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (19 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (18 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (228 citations), Sociology and Political Science (781 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (378 citations). Frank N. Pieke has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tu Weiming, Gregor Benton, Nicholas Van Hear, Anna Lindley, Hein Mallee, Madeline Y. Hsu, Mette Thunø, Craig Calhoun, Pat Howard and Biao Xiang. Their work appears in journals such as Annual Review of Anthropology, International Migration Review and Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026