Frank H. Dodd

3.0k citations
76 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Frank H. Dodd

73 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Frank H. Dodd
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.9k
  • Small Animals 484
  • Microbiology 294
  • Food Science 644
  • Animal Science and Zoology 332
Replace Frank K. Neave with:
Frank K. Neave United Kingdom
P.S. Schoenberger United States
Lawrence E. Heider United States
Rubén N. González United States
Francis L. Welcome United States
Ralph J. Farnsworth United States
Ilka Christine Klaas Denmark
S. Waage Norway
James E. Breen United Kingdom
Fred J. DeGraves United States
Frank H. Dodd relative to Frank K. Neave United Kingdom Frank K. Neave's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Frank K. Neave · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank H. Dodd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank H. Dodd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank H. Dodd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank H. Dodd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank H. Dodd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank H. Dodd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank H. Dodd. The network helps show where Frank H. Dodd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank H. Dodd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frank H. Dodd Line = papers co-authored together Frank H. Dodd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969275
2 1984232
3 1970101
4 196696
5 196995
6 196782
7
Machine milking and lactation.
199277
8 198067
9 198365
10 196655
11 195154
12 196745
13 197743
14 195642
15 196638
16 199238
17 196736
18
Mastitis control and herd management.
198135
19 195633
20 196532

About Frank H. Dodd

Frank H. Dodd is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics and Food Science, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (61 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (5 papers), Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (3 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (1.9k citations), Small Animals (484 citations), Microbiology (294 citations), Food Science (644 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (332 citations). Frank H. Dodd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Frank K. Neave, Andrew J. Bramley, R. G. Kingwill, David R. Westgarth, Jane Wheelock, Arnold R. Smith, J. A. F. Rook, Jane Oliver, Graeme Mein and Caroline Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Research, Journal of Dairy Science, Veterinary Record, Outlook on Agriculture and Australian Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact