Frank Farnham

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 680 citations indexed

About

Frank Farnham is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frank Farnham has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 680 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 22 papers in Clinical Psychology and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Frank Farnham's work include Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (23 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers). Frank Farnham is often cited by papers focused on Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (23 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers). Frank Farnham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frank Farnham's co-authors include David James, Lulu Preston, J. Reid Meloy, Brian Darnley, Michele Pathé, Paul E. Mullen, P.E. Mullen, Emily Corner, Paul Gill and Ronald Schouten and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Psychological Medicine and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Frank Farnham

34 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frank Farnham United Kingdom 17 530 457 171 127 35 34 680
Marie Christine Bergmann Germany 11 159 0.3× 228 0.5× 160 0.9× 113 0.9× 21 0.6× 25 406
Mary Ellen O’Toole United States 8 241 0.5× 212 0.5× 158 0.9× 181 1.4× 29 0.8× 19 411
Kris Mohandie United States 14 506 1.0× 468 1.0× 106 0.6× 284 2.2× 13 0.4× 20 673
Sarah Tucker United States 7 208 0.4× 144 0.3× 72 0.4× 119 0.9× 93 2.7× 18 350
Bárbara G. Amado Spain 9 141 0.3× 267 0.6× 251 1.5× 109 0.9× 63 1.8× 19 480
Shelley A. Price United Kingdom 6 197 0.4× 180 0.4× 87 0.5× 181 1.4× 147 4.2× 9 359
Chantal A. Hermann Canada 15 422 0.8× 534 1.2× 68 0.4× 113 0.9× 238 6.8× 30 678
Angela W. Eke Canada 12 672 1.3× 609 1.3× 27 0.2× 242 1.9× 132 3.8× 25 802
Caitlyn N. Muniz United States 9 166 0.3× 143 0.3× 62 0.4× 42 0.3× 28 0.8× 23 285
Timothy Griffin United States 10 504 1.0× 288 0.6× 42 0.2× 34 0.3× 37 1.1× 29 600

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Farnham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Farnham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Farnham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Farnham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Farnham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Farnham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Farnham. The network helps show where Frank Farnham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Farnham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Farnham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Farnham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Farnham. Frank Farnham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clemmow, Caitlin, et al.. (2024). Beyond binary: Analyzing closed‐source data to compare specific roles and behaviors within violent and nonviolent terrorist involvement. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 70(1). 222–236. 1 indexed citations
2.
James, David, et al.. (2022). Threats to public figures and association with approach, as a proxy for violence: The importance of grievance. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 998155–998155. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kothari, Radha, et al.. (2021). Understanding Risk of Suicide among perpetrators who view child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 81. 102188–102188. 6 indexed citations
4.
Clemmow, Caitlin, Paul Gill, Emily Corner, et al.. (2021). A data-driven classification of outcome behaviors in those who cause concern to British public figures.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 27(4). 509–521. 3 indexed citations
5.
Underwood, Alan, et al.. (2021). Suicidal behavior in individuals accused or convicted of child sex abuse or indecent image offenses: Systematic review of prevalence and risk factors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 51(4). 715–728. 10 indexed citations
6.
Corner, Emily, Paul Gill, Ronald Schouten, & Frank Farnham. (2018). Mental Disorders, Personality Traits, and Grievance-Fueled Targeted Violence: The Evidence Base and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Personality Assessment. 100(5). 459–470. 28 indexed citations
7.
James, David, et al.. (2016). Aggressive/intrusive behaviours, harassment and stalking of members of the United Kingdom parliament: a prevalence study and cross-national comparison. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 27(2). 177–197. 32 indexed citations
8.
James, David, et al.. (2010). The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre: preventing harm and facilitating care. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 21(4). 521–536. 38 indexed citations
9.
Meloy, J. Reid, David James, Paul E. Mullen, et al.. (2010). Factors Associated with Escalation and Problematic Approaches Toward Public Figures*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 56(s1). 329–35. 27 indexed citations
10.
James, David, Paul E. Mullen, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2010). Stalkers and harassers of British Royalty: an exploration of proxy behaviours for violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 29(1). 64–80. 22 indexed citations
11.
Blackwood, Nigel, et al.. (2009). Reformulating fitness to plead: a qualitative study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 20(6). 815–834. 10 indexed citations
12.
James, David, P.E. Mullen, Michele Pathé, et al.. (2009). Stalkers and harassers of royalty: the role of mental illness and motivation. Psychological Medicine. 39(9). 1479–1490. 37 indexed citations
13.
James, David, Paul E. Mullen, Michele Pathé, et al.. (2008). Attacks on the British Royal family: the role of psychotic illness.. PubMed. 36(1). 59–67. 41 indexed citations
14.
Blackwood, Nigel, et al.. (2008). Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: a systematic review of the constructs and their application. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 19(4). 576–596. 16 indexed citations
15.
Mullen, Paul E., David James, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2008). The fixated and the pursuit of public figures. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 20(1). 33–47. 58 indexed citations
16.
James, David, P.E. Mullen, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2007). The role of mental disorder in attacks on European politicians 1990–2004. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 116(5). 334–344. 71 indexed citations
17.
James, David & Frank Farnham. (2003). Stalking and serious violence.. PubMed. 31(4). 432–9. 74 indexed citations
18.
Farnham, Frank & David James. (2000). Patients' attitudes to psychiatric hospital admission. The Lancet. 355(9204). 594–594. 16 indexed citations
19.
Farnham, Frank, et al.. (1999). Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: A multi-disciplinary approach. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 10(2). 343–354. 26 indexed citations
20.
Farnham, Frank, Craig Ritchie, David James, & Harry Kennedy. (1997). Pathology of love. The Lancet. 350(9079). 710–710. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026