Brian Darnley

442 total citations
9 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Brian Darnley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian Darnley has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Brian Darnley's work include Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (7 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (4 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). Brian Darnley is often cited by papers focused on Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (7 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (4 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). Brian Darnley collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Brian Darnley's co-authors include Lulu Preston, J. Reid Meloy, David James, Michele Pathé, Frank Farnham, Paul E. Mullen, P.E. Mullen, Rachel MacKenzie, Mario J. Scalora and Troy E. McEwan and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Journal of Forensic Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Brian Darnley

8 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brian Darnley Australia	8	300	206	112	77	11	9	332
Lulu Preston Australia	9	329 1.1×	232 1.1×	122 1.1×	83 1.1×	13 1.2×	11	371
Angela Guldimann Switzerland	6	223 0.7×	168 0.8×	86 0.8×	88 1.1×	5 0.5×	15	293
Paige J. Deckert United States	3	231 0.8×	91 0.4×	42 0.4×	49 0.6×	10 0.9×	3	258
Russell E. Palarea United States	7	373 1.2×	297 1.4×	101 0.9×	138 1.8×	13 1.2×	8	412
Caitlin Clemmow United Kingdom	7	172 0.6×	95 0.5×	42 0.4×	37 0.5×	6 0.5×	25	207
Michael Wolfowicz Israel	9	259 0.9×	93 0.5×	78 0.7×	18 0.2×	12 1.1×	17	302
Yael Litmanovitz Israel	6	183 0.6×	72 0.3×	62 0.6×	13 0.2×	6 0.5×	11	208
Michael A. Jensen United States	5	208 0.7×	60 0.3×	29 0.3×	19 0.2×	8 0.7×	8	229
Robert Lehmann Germany	11	219 0.7×	259 1.3×	28 0.3×	19 0.2×	20 1.8×	54	325
Gérard Labuschagne South Africa	11	183 0.6×	105 0.5×	15 0.1×	32 0.4×	9 0.8×	22	225

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Darnley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Darnley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Darnley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Darnley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Darnley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Darnley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Darnley. The network helps show where Brian Darnley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Darnley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Darnley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Darnley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Darnley. Brian Darnley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Darnley, Brian, et al.. (2011). Psychotic processes in forensic institutions. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. 25(1). 55–68.

2.

Meloy, J. Reid, David James, Paul E. Mullen, et al.. (2010). Factors Associated with Escalation and Problematic Approaches Toward Public Figures*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 56(s1). 329–35. 27 indexed citations

3.

James, David, Paul E. Mullen, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2010). Stalkers and harassers of British Royalty: an exploration of proxy behaviours for violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 29(1). 64–80. 22 indexed citations

4.

James, David, P.E. Mullen, Michele Pathé, et al.. (2009). Stalkers and harassers of royalty: the role of mental illness and motivation. Psychological Medicine. 39(9). 1479–1490. 37 indexed citations

5.

James, David, Troy E. McEwan, Rachel MacKenzie, et al.. (2009). Persistence in stalking: a comparison of associations in general forensic and public figure samples. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 21(2). 283–305. 27 indexed citations

6.

James, David, Paul E. Mullen, Michele Pathé, et al.. (2008). Attacks on the British Royal family: the role of psychotic illness.. PubMed. 36(1). 59–67. 41 indexed citations

7.

Mullen, Paul E., David James, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2008). The fixated and the pursuit of public figures. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 20(1). 33–47. 58 indexed citations

8.

James, David, P.E. Mullen, J. Reid Meloy, et al.. (2007). The role of mental disorder in attacks on European politicians 1990–2004. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 116(5). 334–344. 71 indexed citations

9.

Meloy, J. Reid, David James, Frank Farnham, et al.. (2004). A Research Review of Public Figure Threats, Approaches, Attacks, and Assassinations in the United States. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 49(5). JFS2004102–8. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact