Emily Corner
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Paul GillJohn HorganOliver MasonNoemié BouhanaMaura ConwayAmy ThorntonMia BloomJames Silver
- Topics
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (26 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emily Corner
30 papers receiving 809 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Sociology and Political Science 767
- Clinical Psychology 429
- Social Psychology 138
- Health 121
- Artificial Intelligence 49
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Corner
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Corner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Corner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Corner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Corner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Corner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Corner. The network helps show where Emily Corner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Corner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Corner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Corner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Corner. Emily Corner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Background and Preparatory Behaviours of Right-Wing Extremist Lone Actors: A Comparative Study | 19 |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | Is There a Nexus Between Terrorist Involvement and Mental Health in the Age of the Islamic State? | 15 |
| 13 | 76 | |
| 14 | 101 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | Lone wolf terrorism: understanding the growing threat | 1 |
| 18 | 182 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Emily Corner
Emily Corner is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (26 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (429 citations), Sociology and Political Science (767 citations) and Health (121 citations). Emily Corner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Gill, John Horgan, Oliver Mason, Noemié Bouhana, Maura Conway, Amy Thornton, Mia Bloom, James Silver, Helen Taylor and Frank Farnham. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Personality Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.