Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime
2010962 citationsThomas M. Niemczyk, Frank Deppe et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Deppe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Deppe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Deppe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Deppe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Deppe. The network helps show where Frank Deppe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Deppe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Deppe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Deppe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Deppe. Frank Deppe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fedorov, Kirill G., Peter Eder, Mark H. Fischer, et al.. (2017). Entanglement measurements with propagating two-mode squeezed microwave states. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.
8.
Deppe, Frank. (2012). Gewerkschaften in der Großen Transformation : von den 1970er Jahren bis heute : eine Einführung.3 indexed citations
9.
Baust, A., E. P. Menzel, Thomas M. Niemczyk, et al.. (2011). Characterization of flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifiers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2011.1 indexed citations
Deppe, Frank. (2005). Habermas' Manifesto for a European Renaissance: A Critique. Socialist register. 41(41).1 indexed citations
12.
Beckmann, Martin J., Hans‐Jürgen Bieling, & Frank Deppe. (2003). "Euro-Kapitalismus" und globale politische Ökonomie.2 indexed citations
13.
Deppe, Frank. (2003). Politisches Denken zwischen den Weltkriegen.1 indexed citations
14.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (2001). Ein neuer Kapitalismus? : Akkumulationsregime, Shareholder Society, Neoliberalismus und neue Sozialdemokratie.2 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, Caroline, et al.. (1993). Auf dem Weg zur Hegemonialmacht? : die deutsche Aussenpolitik nach der Vereinigung.2 indexed citations
16.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (1991). Binnenmarkt '92 : zur Entwicklung der Arbeitsbeziehungen in Europa.1 indexed citations
17.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (1978). Staat, multinationale Konzerne und politische Union in Westeuropa : ein Beitrag zur Staatstheorie und Analyse regionaler Integration.1 indexed citations
18.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (1977). Geschichte der deutschen Gewerkschaftsbewegung.6 indexed citations
19.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (1976). Arbeiterbewegung und westeuropäische Integration.1 indexed citations
20.
Deppe, Frank, et al.. (1971). Das Bewußtsein der Arbeiter : Studien zur politischen Soziologie des Arbeiterbéwußtseins.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.