Francis R. Johnson
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Molecular Biology
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Anthropology
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers)History of Science and Medicine (1 paper)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Francis R. Johnson
7 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Ophthalmology 28
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 21
- Molecular Biology 18
- Literature and Literary Theory 18
- Anthropology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Francis R. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Francis R. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francis R. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francis R. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francis R. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francis R. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francis R. Johnson. The network helps show where Francis R. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francis R. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francis R. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francis R. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francis R. Johnson. Francis R. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 'OVID WITH A LITTLETON': THE COST OF ENGLISH BOOKS IN THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURY | 1 |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | A comprehensive Persian-English dictionary : including the Arabic words and phrases to be met with in Persian literature, being Johnson and Richardson's Persian, Arabic & English dictionary | 2 |
| 5 | A comprehensive Persian-English dictionary : including the Arabic words and phrases to be met with in Persian literature, being Johnson and Richardson's Persian, Arabic, and English dictionary, revised, enlarged and entirely reconstructed | 7 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 0 |
About Francis R. Johnson
Francis R. Johnson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Algebra and Number Theory and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 12 papers that have together received 96 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (28 citations), Classics (7 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (18 citations). Francis R. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D.M. Maurice, Helge Kökeritz, George Sarton, John Richardson, H. S. Bennett and David McKitterick. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Isis and Archiv der Mathematik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.