Francesco Pinnen
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gino LucenteAdriano MollicaIvana CacciatoreAntonio Di StefanoAzzurra StefanucciGrazia LuisiPiera SozioCatia Cornacchia
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (38 papers)Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (18 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (14 papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical JournalFree Radical Biology and MedicineInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Francesco Pinnen
102 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Organic Chemistry 650
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 369
- Biochemistry 305
- Physiology 302
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Pinnen
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Pinnen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Pinnen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Pinnen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Pinnen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Pinnen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Pinnen. The network helps show where Francesco Pinnen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Pinnen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Pinnen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Pinnen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Pinnen. Francesco Pinnen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 65 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Francesco Pinnen
Francesco Pinnen is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Organic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (38 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (18 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (305 citations), Organic Chemistry (650 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (369 citations). Francesco Pinnen has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Gino Lucente, Adriano Mollica, Ivana Cacciatore, Antonio Di Stefano, Azzurra Stefanucci, Grazia Luisi, Piera Sozio, Catia Cornacchia, Federica Feliciani and Leonardo Baldassarre. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Journal, Free Radical Biology and Medicine and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.