Frances Lin

5.3k citations
100 papers · 2.5k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 25

Frances Lin

92 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in h...3602018202620202023100200300

Peers

Frances Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Occupational Therapy 748
  • Emergency Medical Services 690
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 363
  • Research and Theory 48
  • Rehabilitation 355
Replace Fiona Coyer with:
Fiona Coyer Australia
Brigid M. Gillespie Australia
Gavin Leslie Australia
Heidi L. Wald United States
Kátia Grillo Padilha Brazil
Lena Gunningberg Sweden
Mary Courtney Australia
Glenn Gardner Australia
Mary T. Champagne United States
Sonya Osborne Australia
Frances Lin relative to Fiona Coyer Australia Fiona Coyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Fiona Coyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frances Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances Lin. The network helps show where Frances Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frances Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frances Lin Line = papers co-authored together Frances Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20244
3 20240
4 20242
5 202317
6 20235
7 20239
8 20230
9 202225
10 202219
11 20217
12 20218
13 202115
14 202113
15 20203
16 201910
17 201822
18 201522
19
International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters
20157
20 201126

About Frances Lin

Frances Lin is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (21 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (16 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (13 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (12 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (11 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (10 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (9 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (748 citations), Emergency Medical Services (690 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (363 citations), Research and Theory (48 citations) and Rehabilitation (355 citations). Frances Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Chaboyer, Lukman Thalib, Zhaoyu Li, Marion Mitchell, Claire M. Rickard, Andrea P. Marshall, Marianne Wallis, Sheila Inwood, Leonard A. Mermel and Peter J. Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Journal of Wound Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026