Frances E. Dolan

1.4k citations
36 papers · 391 indexed · h-index 10

Frances E. Dolan

27 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Frances E. Dolan
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • History 163
  • Literature and Literary Theory 161
  • Classics 45
  • Religious studies 41
  • Museology 27
Replace Andrew Hadfield with:
Andrew Hadfield United Kingdom
Helen Smith United Kingdom
J.B. Bullen Australia
Lorna Duffin United Kingdom
Marc Robinson United States
Roberta Davidson United States
Ch. Didier Gondola France
Carine M. Mardorossian United States
Peter Blanchard Canada
Sarah Street United States
Frances E. Dolan relative to Andrew Hadfield United Kingdom Andrew Hadfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Andrew Hadfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frances E. Dolan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances E. Dolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances E. Dolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances E. Dolan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances E. Dolan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances E. Dolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances E. Dolan. The network helps show where Frances E. Dolan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Frances E. Dolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frances E. Dolan Line = papers co-authored together Frances E. Dolan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20200
2 20190
3 20140
4 20131
5 201317
6 20120
7 20111
8 20117
9 20074
10
Battered Women, Petty Traitors, and the Legacy of Coverture
20034
11 200313
12
Readers, Evidence, and Interdisciplinarity
20022
13 20025
14 200216
15 19971
16 19943
17 199416
18 199318
19
Home-Rebels and House-Traitors: Murderous Wives in Early Modern England
19928
20 19919

About Frances E. Dolan

Frances E. Dolan is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, Museology and Classics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (8 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (6 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (163 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (161 citations), Classics (45 citations), Religious studies (41 citations) and Museology (27 citations). Frances E. Dolan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Katharine Eisaman Maus, Natasha Korda, Sarah Cowley, Paula Baraitser, P. A. M. Berry, Jean E. Howard, Barbara Fuchs, Patricia Fumerton, Heather Dubrow and Emma Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Huntington Library Quarterly, English Literary Renaissance, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care and Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026