Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
AIN-93 Purified Diets for Laboratory Rodents: Final Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Writing Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN-76A Rodent Diet
19937.4k citationsForrest H. Nielsen et al.Journal of Nutritionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Forrest H. Nielsen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest H. Nielsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest H. Nielsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest H. Nielsen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest H. Nielsen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest H. Nielsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest H. Nielsen. The network helps show where Forrest H. Nielsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest H. Nielsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest H. Nielsen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest H. Nielsen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest H. Nielsen. Forrest H. Nielsen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nielsen, Forrest H., et al.. (1995). Manganese deprivation affects response to nickel deprivation. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine.2 indexed citations
Nielsen, Forrest H.. (1993). Ultratrace elements of possible importance for human health: an update.. PubMed. 380. 355–76.20 indexed citations
14.
Nielsen, Forrest H., Terrence R. Shuler, & Eric O. Uthus. (1992). Dietary arginine and methionine effects, and their modification by dietary boron and potassium, on the mineral element composition of plasma and bone in the rat. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine. 5(4). 247–259.8 indexed citations
15.
Nielsen, Forrest H., et al.. (1992). Boron enhances and mimics some effects of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine. 5(4). 237–246.34 indexed citations
16.
Nielsen, Forrest H.. (1990). Studies on the relationship between boron and magnesium which possibly affects the formation and maintenance of bones [electronic resource].1 indexed citations
17.
Shuler, Terrence R., et al.. (1990). Effect of thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease on macro, trace, and ultratrace element concentrations in human tissue. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine.12 indexed citations
18.
Nielsen, Forrest H., et al.. (1990). Effect of boron depletion and repletion on blood indicators of calcium status in humans fed a magnesium-low diet. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine.38 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.