Florian Foos

447 total citations
20 papers, 196 citations indexed

About

Florian Foos is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Florian Foos has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 196 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 13 papers in Communication and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Florian Foos's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (6 papers). Florian Foos is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (6 papers). Florian Foos collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Florian Foos's co-authors include Eline A. de Rooij, Daniel Bischof, Peter John, Elias Dinas, Fabrizio Gilardi, Frank Schimmelfennig, Nikolay Marinov, Alexander Wuttke, Stuart J. Turnbull‐Dugarte and Nick Vivyan and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

Florian Foos

19 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Florian Foos United Kingdom	9	122	114	88	32	19	20	196
Daniel M. Shea United States	10	104 0.9×	82 0.7×	90 1.0×	36 1.1×	22 1.2×	23	183
Luzia Helfer Switzerland	9	160 1.3×	95 0.8×	113 1.3×	35 1.1×	7 0.4×	16	239
Tobias Konitzer United States	8	108 0.9×	150 1.3×	140 1.6×	23 0.7×	24 1.3×	10	253
Aim Sinpeng Australia	9	127 1.0×	158 1.4×	69 0.8×	22 0.7×	33 1.7×	23	231
Andrés Santana Spain	9	282 2.3×	105 0.9×	75 0.9×	45 1.4×	16 0.8×	28	340
Edana Beauvais Canada	8	103 0.8×	86 0.8×	92 1.0×	42 1.3×	20 1.1×	16	197
Gustav Meibauer United Kingdom	11	162 1.3×	99 0.9×	24 0.3×	26 0.8×	13 0.7×	18	236
Matt Guardino United States	8	114 0.9×	136 1.2×	107 1.2×	13 0.4×	5 0.3×	13	225
Spyros Kosmidis United Kingdom	10	156 1.3×	107 0.9×	60 0.7×	24 0.8×	36 1.9×	11	243
Céline Colombo Switzerland	7	180 1.5×	115 1.0×	63 0.7×	19 0.6×	8 0.4×	10	236

Countries citing papers authored by Florian Foos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Florian Foos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florian Foos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florian Foos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Florian Foos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florian Foos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florian Foos. The network helps show where Florian Foos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florian Foos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florian Foos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florian Foos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florian Foos. Florian Foos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2025). Media Platforming and the Normalisation of Extreme Right Views. British Journal of Political Science. 55.

Turnbull‐Dugarte, Stuart J., et al.. (2024). Negative Political Identities and Costly Political Action. The Journal of Politics. 87(1). 291–305. 4 indexed citations

Wuttke, Alexander & Florian Foos. (2024). Making the case for democracy: A field-experiment on democratic persuasion. European Journal of Political Research. 64(2). 559–579. 2 indexed citations

Foos, Florian. (2024). The Use of AI by Election Campaigns. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 3(3). 1 indexed citations

John, Peter, et al.. (2024). Null effects of social media ads on voter registration: Three digital field experiments. Research & Politics. 11(1). 2 indexed citations

Wuttke, Alexander, et al.. (2023). Null Effects of Pro-Democracy Speeches by U.S. Republicans in the Aftermath of January 6th. Journal of Experimental Political Science. 11(1). 27–41. 8 indexed citations

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2023). Do text messages increase voter registration? Evidence from RCTs with a local authority and an advocacy organisation in the UK. Electoral Studies. 81. 102572–102572. 4 indexed citations

Turnbull‐Dugarte, Stuart J., et al.. (2021). Mobilising support when the stakes are high: Mass emails affect constituent‐to‐legislator lobbying. European Journal of Political Research. 61(2). 601–619. 3 indexed citations

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2021). Mobilizing party activism: A field experiment with party members and sympathizers. Electoral Studies. 72. 102341–102341. 3 indexed citations

10.

Foos, Florian & Daniel Bischof. (2021). Tabloid Media Campaigns and Public Opinion: Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Euroscepticism in England. American Political Science Review. 116(1). 19–37. 27 indexed citations

11.

Bischof, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Advantages, Challenges and Limitations of Audit Experiments with Constituents. Political Studies Review. 20(2). 192–200. 10 indexed citations

12.

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2020). Does Social Media Promote Civic Activism? A Field Experiment with a Civic Campaign. Political Science Research and Methods. 9(3). 500–518. 19 indexed citations

13.

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2020). Social Mobilization in Partisan Spaces. The Journal of Politics. 83(3). 1190–1197. 4 indexed citations

14.

Foos, Florian & Fabrizio Gilardi. (2019). Does Exposure to Gender Role Models Increase Women’s Political Ambition? A Field Experiment with Politicians. Journal of Experimental Political Science. 7(3). 157–166. 19 indexed citations

15.

Dinas, Elias & Florian Foos. (2017). The National Effects of Subnational Representation: Access to Regional Parliaments and National Electoral Performance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 12(1). 1–35. 17 indexed citations

16.

Foos, Florian & Peter John. (2016). Parties are No Civic Charities: Voter Contact and the Changing Partisan Composition of the Electorate. Political Science Research and Methods. 6(2). 283–298. 20 indexed citations

17.

Foos, Florian & Eline A. de Rooij. (2016). The role of partisan cues in voter mobilization campaigns: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Electoral Studies. 45. 63–74. 18 indexed citations

18.

Foos, Florian & Eline A. de Rooij. (2016). All in the Family: Partisan Disagreement and Electoral Mobilization in Intimate Networks—A Spillover Experiment. American Journal of Political Science. 61(2). 289–304. 30 indexed citations

19.

Foos, Florian, et al.. (2015). Does Social Media Promote Civic Activism? A Field Experiment with a Civic Campaign. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

20.

Dinas, Elias & Florian Foos. (2013). The National Effects of Subnational Representation: How Partiess Access to Regional Parliaments Shapes National Elections. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact