Gustav Meibauer
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Development top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Communication
- Co-authors
- Corina LacatusJennifer Sterling-FolkerNicholas KitchenGeorg LöfflmannAndrew GlencrossAngelos ChryssogelosKaren E. Smith
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (9 papers)Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers)Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers)
- Journals
- International Studies QuarterlyEuropean Journal of International RelationsReview of International Studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gustav Meibauer
17 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Political Science and International Relations 162
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Development 28
- Gender Studies 26
- Communication 24
Countries citing papers authored by Gustav Meibauer
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustav Meibauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustav Meibauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustav Meibauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustav Meibauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustav Meibauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustav Meibauer. The network helps show where Gustav Meibauer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustav Meibauer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustav Meibauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustav Meibauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustav Meibauer. Gustav Meibauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 11 |
About Gustav Meibauer
Gustav Meibauer is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (9 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (28 citations), Political Science and International Relations (162 citations) and Communication (24 citations). Gustav Meibauer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Corina Lacatus, Jennifer Sterling-Folker, Nicholas Kitchen, Georg Löfflmann, Andrew Glencross, Angelos Chryssogelos and Karen E. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as International Studies Quarterly, European Journal of International Relations and Review of International Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.