Fleur Heleen Boot
- Occupational Therapy top 0.5%
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility 6
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 3
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 3
- Safety Research top 10%
-
- Down syndrome and intellectual disability research 6
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 5
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 4
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 1
-
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology 1
- Co-authors
- Malcolm MacLachlanJohn DinsmoreJohan J. M. PelJ. van der SteenHeleen M. EvenhuisJohn OwuorJacob A. BentleyLynn Gitlow
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (1 paper)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIrelandCzechia
In The Last Decade
Fleur Heleen Boot
14 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Occupational Therapy 226
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 160
- Safety Research 55
- Management of Technology and Innovation 42
Countries citing papers authored by Fleur Heleen Boot
This map shows the geographic impact of Fleur Heleen Boot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleur Heleen Boot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleur Heleen Boot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fleur Heleen Boot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleur Heleen Boot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleur Heleen Boot. The network helps show where Fleur Heleen Boot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fleur Heleen Boot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 148 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 77 |
About Fleur Heleen Boot
Fleur Heleen Boot is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (226 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (23 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (160 citations). Fleur Heleen Boot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ireland and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm MacLachlan, John Dinsmore, Johan J. M. Pel, J. van der Steen, Heleen M. Evenhuis, John Owuor, Jacob A. Bentley, Lynn Gitlow, Katerina Mavrou and Natasha Layton. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.