Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 6
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 3
- Insect and Pesticide Research 2
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 6
- Plant and animal studies 3
- Genetics top 10%
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 9
- Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies 3
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Nina WedellMark A. ElgarS RamamurthyMarie E. HerbersteinLaurence D. HurstRoger K. ButlinTom TregenzaAnne C. Gaskett
- Journals
- Current Biology (2 papers)Evolution (1 paper)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny
15 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Insect Science 230
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 231
- Genetics 204
- Horticulture 5
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 37
Countries citing papers authored by Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny
This map shows the geographic impact of Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny. The network helps show where Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estimating the true number of work-related fatalities due to injury: the traumatic injury fatalities dataset | 2014 | 2 |
| 2 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 74 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 81 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 8 |
About Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny
Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (230 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (231 citations) and Genetics (204 citations). Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nina Wedell, Mark A. Elgar, S Ramamurthy, Marie E. Herberstein, Laurence D. Hurst, Roger K. Butlin, Tom Tregenza, Anne C. Gaskett, Zenobia Lewis and Matthew J. Bruce. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.