Fleur Deken
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hans BerendsKristina LaucheMaaike KleinsmannAndy DongPhilipp TuertscherGerda GemserPaul R. CarlileFrans Feldberg
- Topics
- Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Management of Technology and InnovationStrategy and ManagementOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsDenmarkAustralia
In The Last Decade
Fleur Deken
18 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Strategy and Management 232
- Management of Technology and Innovation 116
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Mechanical Engineering 108
- Management Science and Operations Research 103
Countries citing papers authored by Fleur Deken
This map shows the geographic impact of Fleur Deken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleur Deken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleur Deken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fleur Deken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleur Deken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleur Deken. The network helps show where Fleur Deken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fleur Deken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fleur Deken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fleur Deken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fleur Deken. Fleur Deken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | In and out of sync: Temporal coordination in digital innovation ecosystems | 0 |
| 8 | 62 | |
| 9 | 92 | |
| 10 | 70 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | Novice-Expert Design Consultations: Findings from a Field Study | 2 |
About Fleur Deken
Fleur Deken is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research and Management Information Systems, having authored 19 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (116 citations), Strategy and Management (232 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (97 citations). Fleur Deken has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hans Berends, Kristina Lauche, Maaike Kleinsmann, Andy Dong, Philipp Tuertscher, Gerda Gemser, Paul R. Carlile, Frans Feldberg, Marco Aurisicchio and Rob Bracewell. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science and Research Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.