Fleur Deken

894 total citations
19 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

Fleur Deken is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Fleur Deken has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Strategy and Management, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Fleur Deken's work include Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers). Fleur Deken is often cited by papers focused on Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers). Fleur Deken collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Australia. Fleur Deken's co-authors include Hans Berends, Kristina Lauche, Maaike Kleinsmann, Andy Dong, Philipp Tuertscher, Gerda Gemser, Paul R. Carlile, Frans Feldberg, Marco Aurisicchio and Rob Bracewell and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science and Research Policy.

In The Last Decade

Fleur Deken

18 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Fleur Deken Netherlands	12	232	116	109	108	103	19	564
Victor P. Seidel United States	10	250 1.1×	132 1.1×	104 1.0×	79 0.7×	80 0.8×	24	624
Sabrina Bresciani Switzerland	13	170 0.7×	107 0.9×	153 1.4×	95 0.9×	45 0.4×	57	719
Jennie Björk Sweden	15	369 1.6×	140 1.2×	129 1.2×	30 0.3×	90 0.9×	37	807
Mitzi M. Montoya United States	9	248 1.1×	106 0.9×	85 0.8×	44 0.4×	69 0.7×	12	623
Paola Cillo Italy	11	209 0.9×	89 0.8×	85 0.8×	49 0.5×	57 0.6×	22	487
Ursula Koners United Kingdom	8	226 1.0×	71 0.6×	54 0.5×	49 0.5×	96 0.9×	10	455
Anna Rylander Sweden	10	540 2.3×	120 1.0×	112 1.0×	91 0.8×	65 0.6×	17	889
Massimo Garbuio Australia	10	288 1.2×	135 1.2×	36 0.3×	102 0.9×	221 2.1×	27	754
Boris Ewenstein United Kingdom	5	153 0.7×	83 0.7×	209 1.9×	202 1.9×	133 1.3×	6	738
Sihem Ben Mahmoud‐Jouini France	12	253 1.1×	159 1.4×	32 0.3×	84 0.8×	62 0.6×	44	432

Countries citing papers authored by Fleur Deken

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fleur Deken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleur Deken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleur Deken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fleur Deken

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleur Deken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleur Deken. The network helps show where Fleur Deken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fleur Deken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fleur Deken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fleur Deken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fleur Deken. Fleur Deken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Deken, Fleur, et al.. (2024). Boundary work in a project-based organization: Flow across interdependent boundaries in interorganizational programs. International Journal of Project Management. 42(5). 102622–102622. 1 indexed citations

Berends, Hans, et al.. (2023). Another pathway to complementarity: How users and intermediaries identify and create new combinations in innovation ecosystems. Research Policy. 52(7). 104788–104788. 18 indexed citations

Deken, Fleur, et al.. (2022). Navigating multiple contexts to integrate system transformation programs. International Journal of Project Management. 40(3). 290–311. 14 indexed citations

Günther, Wendy, Mohammad Hosein Rezazade Mehrizi, Marleen Huysman, Fleur Deken, & Frans Feldberg. (2022). Resourcing with data: Unpacking the process of creating data-driven value propositions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 31(4). 101744–101744. 19 indexed citations

Deken, Fleur, et al.. (2021). Process-based temporal coordination in multiparty collaboration for societal challenges. Strategic Organization. 20(1). 135–163. 32 indexed citations

Berends, Hans, et al.. (2020). Sustaining Complement Quality for Digital Product Platforms: A Case Study of the Philips Hue Ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 38(1). 21–48. 42 indexed citations

Berends, Hans, et al.. (2019). In and out of sync: Temporal coordination in digital innovation ecosystems.

Berends, Hans, et al.. (2019). Complementors as connectors: managing open innovation around digital product platforms. R and D Management. 50(1). 18–30. 62 indexed citations

Berends, Hans & Fleur Deken. (2019). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization. 19(1). 134–146. 92 indexed citations

10.

Deken, Fleur, Hans Berends, Gerda Gemser, & Kristina Lauche. (2018). Strategizing and the Initiation of Interorganizational Collaboration through Prospective Resourcing. Academy of Management Journal. 61(5). 1920–1950. 70 indexed citations

11.

Berends, Hans, et al.. (2017). Gardening a thousand flowers: Ensuring complement quality over time in the Philips Hue ecosystem. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 11805–11805. 1 indexed citations

12.

Deken, Fleur, Paul R. Carlile, Hans Berends, & Kristina Lauche. (2016). Generating Novelty Through Interdependent Routines: A Process Model of Routine Work. Organization Science. 27(3). 659–677. 57 indexed citations

13.

Deken, Fleur & Kristina Lauche. (2013). COORDINATING THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHARED OBJECT: AN APPROACH TO STUDY INTERORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 11(1). 1440002–1440002. 9 indexed citations

14.

Deken, Fleur, Paul R. Carlile, Hans Berends, & Kristina Lauche. (2013). How routines afford and constrain the incorporation and generation of novelty. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013(1). 12546–12546. 1 indexed citations

15.

Dong, Andy, Maaike Kleinsmann, & Fleur Deken. (2012). Investigating design cognition in the construction and enactment of team mental models. Design Studies. 34(1). 1–33. 55 indexed citations

16.

Deken, Fleur, Hans Berends, Kristina Lauche, & Gerda Gemser. (2012). How do I Know What I Need Before I See What You do? Initiating interorganizational collaboration. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2012(1). 12433–12433. 1 indexed citations

17.

Deken, Fleur, Maaike Kleinsmann, Marco Aurisicchio, Kristina Lauche, & Rob Bracewell. (2011). Tapping into past design experiences: knowledge sharing and creation during novice–expert design consultations. Research in Engineering Design. 23(3). 203–218. 25 indexed citations

18.

Kleinsmann, Maaike, Fleur Deken, Andy Dong, & Kristina Lauche. (2011). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design. 23(7). 485–506. 63 indexed citations

19.

Deken, Fleur, Marco Aurisicchio, Maaike Kleinsmann, & Kristina Lauche. (2009). Novice-Expert Design Consultations: Findings from a Field Study. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 552–559. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact