Fiona Bowie
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Education
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Shirley ArdenerJames L. CoxOliver DaviesKenneth SeeskinRobert LarmerGavin FloodNiels Christian HvidtRoland B. Walter
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fiona Bowie
21 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sociology and Political Science 120
- Anthropology 50
- Religious studies 35
- Education 34
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Bowie
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Bowie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Bowie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Bowie. The network helps show where Fiona Bowie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona Bowie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona Bowie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona Bowie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona Bowie. Fiona Bowie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Anthropology of Religion: Anthropology of Religion | 4 |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Belief or experience? The anthropologist's dilemma | 1 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | The Anthropology of Religion: An Introduction | 79 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Celtic Christian spirituality : an anthology of medieval and modern sources | 3 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Women and Missions Past and Present: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives | 6 |
| 19 | A social and historical study of Christian missions among the Bangwa of South West Cameroon | 5 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Fiona Bowie
Fiona Bowie is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (35 citations), Anthropology (50 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (17 citations). Fiona Bowie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shirley Ardener, James L. Cox, Oliver Davies, Kenneth Seeskin, Robert Larmer, Gavin Flood, Niels Christian Hvidt, Roland B. Walter, Robert Garland and James Carleton Paget. Their work appears in journals such as Heart, Anthropological Quarterly and Journal of Religion in Africa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.