Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert Gethin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert Gethin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert Gethin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert Gethin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert Gethin. The network helps show where Rupert Gethin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rupert Gethin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rupert Gethin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rupert Gethin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rupert Gethin. Rupert Gethin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gethin, Rupert. (2025). Playing with Formulas. Indo-Iranian Journal. 68(1). 35–56.1 indexed citations
2.
Gethin, Rupert. (2020). Schemes of the Buddhist Path in the Nikāyas and Āgamas. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 5–77.1 indexed citations
3.
Gethin, Rupert. (2019). The jhānas in the Buddhist path to liberation: the Theravāda perspective. 177–206.
4.
Gethin, Rupert. (2018). Emptiness and Unknowing. Buddhist Studies Review. 35(1-2). 81–96.1 indexed citations
5.
Gethin, Rupert. (2012). How Theravāda is Theravāda.3 indexed citations
6.
Gethin, Rupert. (2012). Achtsamkeit, Meditation und Therapie. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).1 indexed citations
7.
Basinger, David, Robert Larmer, Roland B. Walter, et al.. (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Miracles. Cambridge University Press eBooks.13 indexed citations
8.
Gethin, Rupert. (2008). Sayings of the Buddha: A selection of suttas from the Pali Nikāyas. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
9.
Gethin, Rupert & Oskar von Hinüber. (2006). Journal of the Pali Text Society. 28.60 indexed citations
10.
Gethin, Rupert. (2006). Mythology as meditation: from the Mahāsudassana Sutta to the Sukhāvativyuha Sūtra. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 28. 63–112.5 indexed citations
11.
Gethin, Rupert. (2005). On the nature of dhammas: a review article. Buddhist Studies Review. 22. 175–194.1 indexed citations
12.
Gethin, Rupert. (2005). On the Nature of Dhammas. Buddhist Studies Review. 22(2). 175–194.1 indexed citations
Gethin, Rupert. (2002). Can Killing A Living Being ever be An Act of Compassion? The Analysis of the Act Killing in the Abhidhamma and Pali Commentaries. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 11. 167–202.17 indexed citations
15.
Gethin, Rupert & Russell Webb. (2001). Buddhist Studies Review. Buddhist Studies Review. 18.1 indexed citations
16.
Gethin, Rupert. (1999). Abhidharma Buddhism to 150 A.D., ed. Karl H. Potter et al. (Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophies VII), Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass, 1996. Buddhist Studies Review. 16. 91–97.
Gethin, Rupert. (1992). The Buddhist Path to Awakening: A Study of the Bodhipakkhiya Dhamma. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.