Winston L. King
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mircéa ÉliadeChristopher IvesHarold CowardHerbert V. GuentherJoseph S. O’LearyElizabeth K. NottinghamDavid Pollack
- Topics
- Indian and Buddhist Studies (12 papers)Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal for the Scientific Study of ReligionThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social SciencePhilosophy East and West
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Winston L. King
25 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- Philosophy 70
- Religious studies 44
- Anthropology 37
- Geography, Planning and Development 29
Countries citing papers authored by Winston L. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Winston L. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winston L. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winston L. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Winston L. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winston L. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winston L. King. The network helps show where Winston L. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Winston L. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Winston L. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Winston L. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Winston L. King. Winston L. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | A Buddhist Ethic Without Karmic Rebirth | 3 |
| 4 | Engaged Buddhism : past, present, future | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Is There a Buddhist Ethic for the Modern World | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Introduction to religion : a phenomenological approach | 6 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | In the hope of nibbana : Theravada Buddhist ethics | 2 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Introduction to religion | 10 |
About Winston L. King
Winston L. King is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (12 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (44 citations), Philosophy (70 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations). Winston L. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mircéa Éliade, Christopher Ives, Harold Coward, Herbert V. Guenther, Joseph S. O’Leary, Elizabeth K. Nottingham and David Pollack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science and Philosophy East and West.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.