Filomena De Leo
- Earth-Surface Processes top 0.5%
- Conservation top 0.05%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Archeology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Clara Urzı̀Laura BrunoGiuseppe CriseoDomenico PangalloLucia KrakováSandra Lo SchiavoMauro Francesco La RussaSilvestro Antonio Ruffolo
- Topics
- Building materials and conservation (30 papers)Conservation Techniques and Studies (20 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers)
- Journals
- The Science of The Total EnvironmentConstruction and Building MaterialsFrontiers in Microbiology
- Partner nations
- ItalySpainNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Filomena De Leo
55 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Earth-Surface Processes 894
- Conservation 570
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 328
- Archeology 293
- Molecular Biology 253
Countries citing papers authored by Filomena De Leo
This map shows the geographic impact of Filomena De Leo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filomena De Leo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filomena De Leo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Filomena De Leo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filomena De Leo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filomena De Leo. The network helps show where Filomena De Leo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Filomena De Leo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Filomena De Leo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Filomena De Leo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Filomena De Leo. Filomena De Leo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 138 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Filomena De Leo
Filomena De Leo is a scholar working on Conservation, Earth-Surface Processes and Microbiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Building materials and conservation (30 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (20 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (570 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (894 citations) and Archeology (293 citations). Filomena De Leo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Clara Urzı̀, Laura Bruno, Giuseppe Criseo, Domenico Pangallo, Lucia Kraková, Sandra Lo Schiavo, Mauro Francesco La Russa, Silvestro Antonio Ruffolo, Patrizia Albertano and Sybren de Hoog. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Construction and Building Materials and Frontiers in Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.