Filip Ejdus

782 citations
33 papers · 425 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Filip Ejdus

27 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers

Filip Ejdus
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 256
  • Development 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 326
  • Cultural Studies 49
  • Space and Planetary Science 6
Replace Giorgio Shani with:
Giorgio Shani Japan
Soner Çaǧaptay United States
Rebecca E. Karl United States
Ahmet Erdi Öztürk United Kingdom
Sumantra Bose United Kingdom
Rana Mitter United Kingdom
Viatcheslav Morozov Estonia
Elena Barabantseva United Kingdom
Christopher J. Lee United States
Ussama Makdisi United States
Filip Ejdus relative to Giorgio Shani Japan Giorgio Shani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Giorgio Shani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Filip Ejdus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Filip Ejdus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filip Ejdus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filip Ejdus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Filip Ejdus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filip Ejdus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filip Ejdus. The network helps show where Filip Ejdus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Filip Ejdus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Filip Ejdus Line = papers co-authored together Filip Ejdus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201793
2 201947
3 201744
4 201734
5 201729
6 201725
7 201621
8 202120
9 201915
10 201612
11 202011
12 20209
13 20179
14 20168
15 20147
16 20245
17 20215
18 20195
19 20145
20
SECURITY, CULTURE AND IDENTITY IN SERBIA
20074

About Filip Ejdus

Filip Ejdus is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Development and Demography, having authored 33 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peacebuilding and International Security (15 papers), Balkans: History, Politics, Society (10 papers), Global Security and Public Health (8 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (6 papers), International Development and Aid (5 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (5 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (5 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (256 citations), Development (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (326 citations), Cultural Studies (49 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (6 citations). Filip Ejdus has collaborated with scholars based in Serbia, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ana E. Juncos, Adam Fagan, Jelena Subotić, Oliver Tošković, Kaja Damnjanović and Dušan Pavlović. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Security Policy, International Relations, Journal of International Relations and Development, Cambridge Review of International Affairs and Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact