Fides del Castillo
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Gregory S. ChingHazel T. BianaJeremiah Joven JoaquinJeff Clyde G. CorpuzHarold G. KoenigAbd. GhofurMuthmainnah MuthmainnahPhilip Joseph D Sarmiento
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthClinical PsychologyPhilosophy
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthSustainability
- Partner nations
- PhilippinesTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fides del Castillo
38 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Sociology and Political Science 131
- Health 124
- Clinical Psychology 120
- Education 91
- Social Psychology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Fides del Castillo
This map shows the geographic impact of Fides del Castillo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fides del Castillo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fides del Castillo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fides del Castillo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fides del Castillo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fides del Castillo. The network helps show where Fides del Castillo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fides del Castillo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fides del Castillo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fides del Castillo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fides del Castillo. Fides del Castillo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Finding God in the Ordinary: Exposition of the Little Flower‟s Spirituality | 1 |
About Fides del Castillo
Fides del Castillo is a scholar working on Health, Health Informatics and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (124 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations) and Philosophy (46 citations). Fides del Castillo has collaborated with scholars based in Philippines, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Ching, Hazel T. Biana, Jeremiah Joven Joaquin, Jeff Clyde G. Corpuz, Harold G. Koenig, Abd. Ghofur, Muthmainnah Muthmainnah, Philip Joseph D Sarmiento and Stefan Huber. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.