Ferdy van Beest

423 total citations
11 papers, 236 citations indexed

About

Ferdy van Beest is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Ferdy van Beest has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 236 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Accounting, 5 papers in Management Information Systems and 4 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Ferdy van Beest's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers). Ferdy van Beest is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers). Ferdy van Beest collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Ferdy van Beest's co-authors include Geert Braam, Bryan Howieson, Robert Pinsker, C.J. Lako, Esther‐Mirjam Sent and René Orij and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Managerial Auditing Journal and Accounting in Europe.

In The Last Decade

Ferdy van Beest

9 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ferdy van Beest Netherlands 4 162 108 47 40 23 11 236
Stefano Cascino United Kingdom 9 184 1.1× 79 0.7× 69 1.5× 51 1.3× 35 1.5× 21 244
Ali Al‐Thuneibat Jordan 9 280 1.7× 178 1.6× 28 0.6× 28 0.7× 34 1.5× 11 339
Walaa Wahid ElKelish United Arab Emirates 9 165 1.0× 67 0.6× 23 0.5× 41 1.0× 44 1.9× 36 226
Michael Maingot Canada 9 201 1.2× 102 0.9× 29 0.6× 64 1.6× 21 0.9× 17 267
Francis Aboagye‐Otchere Ghana 10 165 1.0× 171 1.6× 38 0.8× 37 0.9× 15 0.7× 23 293
Jeffrey J. Archambault United States 6 251 1.5× 141 1.3× 50 1.1× 21 0.5× 41 1.8× 9 295
Rateb Mohammad Alqatamin Jordan 7 222 1.4× 106 1.0× 20 0.4× 20 0.5× 22 1.0× 15 285
Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim United Kingdom 10 279 1.7× 168 1.6× 33 0.7× 51 1.3× 56 2.4× 18 367
Reza Hesarzadeh Iran 11 183 1.1× 137 1.3× 14 0.3× 41 1.0× 44 1.9× 36 286
Samuel L. Tiras United States 10 358 2.2× 168 1.6× 30 0.6× 34 0.8× 105 4.6× 35 401

Countries citing papers authored by Ferdy van Beest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdy van Beest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdy van Beest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdy van Beest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdy van Beest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdy van Beest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdy van Beest. The network helps show where Ferdy van Beest may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ferdy van Beest

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ferdy van Beest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ferdy van Beest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ferdy van Beest. Ferdy van Beest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Beest, Ferdy van & René Orij. (2025). The Omnibus Directive – pros and cons from multiple perspectives. Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie. 99(2). 57–60.
2.
Beest, Ferdy van & Robert Pinsker. (2024). Measuring novice auditor orientation and its impact on judgment. Managerial Auditing Journal. 39(3). 217–237. 1 indexed citations
3.
Beest, Ferdy van, et al.. (2020). Leverage en de toepassing van alternatieve financiële prestatiemaatstaven. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 94(9/10). 333–342.
4.
Beest, Ferdy van, et al.. (2020). Coronacrisis en de financiële verslaggeving van Nederlandse beursfondsen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 94(11/12). 417–426. 1 indexed citations
5.
Beest, Ferdy van, et al.. (2020). Management Reports of Dutch Companies: Their Availability and Compliance with Legal Disclosure Requirements. Accounting in Europe. 18(2). 143–165. 2 indexed citations
6.
Howieson, Bryan, et al.. (2020). Prudential Application of IFRS 9: (Un)Fair Reporting in COVID‐19 Crisis for Banks Worldwide?!. Australian Accounting Review. 30(3). 178–192. 28 indexed citations
7.
Beest, Ferdy van, et al.. (2019). Beschikbaarheid en kwaliteit van het bestuursverslag van grote en middelgrote rechtspersonen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 93(5/6). 139–147. 5 indexed citations
8.
Braam, Geert & Ferdy van Beest. (2013). A Conceptually-Based Empirical Analysis on Quality Differences between UK Annual Reports and US 10-K Reports. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 9(10). 1281–1301. 7 indexed citations
9.
Beest, Ferdy van, C.J. Lako, & Esther‐Mirjam Sent. (2012). Health insurance and switching behavior: Evidence from the Netherlands. Health. 4(10). 811–820. 2 indexed citations
10.
Beest, Ferdy van, et al.. (2009). Quality of financial reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics. 189 indexed citations
11.
Beest, Ferdy van & Geert Braam. (2006). Convergence through divergence. An analysis of relationships between qualitative characteristics of the conceptual frameworks of the FASB and IASB. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026