Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jean BlondelStephen G. FritzKurt LutherThomas PoguntkeHans KemanPhilipp HarfstMichelangelo VercesiDetlef Jahn
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers)Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
38 papers receiving 710 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Political Science and International Relations 643
- Sociology and Political Science 247
- Strategy and Management 174
- Communication 85
- Gender Studies 48
Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel. The network helps show where Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel. Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | Party Politics and Democracy in Europe : Essays in honour of Peter Mair | 13 |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Political parties in the new Europe : political and analytical challenges | 71 |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | Cabinets in Western Europe (2nd edition) | 0 |
| 15 | Governing together : the extent and limits of joint decision-making in Western European cabinets | 57 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel
Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 43 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (643 citations), Communication (85 citations) and Public Administration (41 citations). Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jean Blondel, Stephen G. Fritz, Kurt Luther, Thomas Poguntke, Hans Keman, Philipp Harfst, Michelangelo Vercesi, Detlef Jahn, Fernando Casal Bértoa and Dirk Berg‐Schlosser. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Political Studies, European Journal of Political Research and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.