Feng Wei

769 citations
43 papers · 582 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Wei

38 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

Feng Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Economics and Econometrics 314
  • Business and International Management 21
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87
  • Strategy and Management 143
  • Accounting 105
Replace Oluwatoyin Matthew with:
Oluwatoyin Matthew Nigeria
Anthony Amoah Ghana
Sanghamitra Das India
Chunlai Chen Australia
Rastislav Kotulič Slovakia
Luc Savard Canada
Levent Kutlu United States
Robert Ackrill United Kingdom
Bismark Addai China
Laura Mariana Cismaș Romania
Feng Wei relative to Oluwatoyin Matthew Nigeria Oluwatoyin Matthew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Oluwatoyin Matthew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Wei. The network helps show where Feng Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Feng Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Wei Line = papers co-authored together Feng Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201882
2 201771
3 201750
4 202149
5 202035
6 201723
7 201721
8 202121
9 202320
10 201919
11 202416
12 201714
13 202213
14 201713
15 201613
16 202113
17 201412
18 202111
19 201810
20 20227

About Feng Wei

Feng Wei is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Marketing, having authored 43 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers) and International Business and FDI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (314 citations), Business and International Management (21 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (87 citations), Strategy and Management (143 citations) and Accounting (105 citations). Feng Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yuansheng Jiang, Hang Yuan, Abbas Ali Chandio, Dan Liu, Abdul Rehman, Abbas Ali Chandio, Xin Deng, Shujun Sun, Yanbin Qi and Lan Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Economic Analysis and Policy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade and Agricultural Finance Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact