Economic Analysis and Policy

2.1k papers and 30.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy in the last decades have received a total of 30.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (339 papers) and Accounting (320 papers) specifically the topics of Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (481 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (299 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (209 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economic Analysis and Policy are Clem Tisdell, Shunsuke Managi, George Halkos, Chien‐Chiang Lee, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary, David J. Teece, Samuel Adams, Muhammad Umar, Paresh Kumar Narayan and Fuhao Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Economic Analysis and Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economic Analysis and Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economic Analysis and Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic Analysis and Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025