Feng Gai

8.9k citations
178 papers · 7.6k indexed · h-index 51

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Gai

176 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

Feng Gai
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.0k
  • Spectroscopy 1.6k
  • Biophysics 472
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.2k
  • Molecular Biology 4.9k
Replace Reinhard Schweitzer‐Stenner with:
Reinhard Schweitzer‐Stenner United States
Neil W. Isaacs United Kingdom
Martin Hof Czechia
Thom Vreven United States
Martin Caffrey United States
A. Joshua Wand United States
Giuseppe Zaccaı̈ France
Martin T. Zanni United States
John Katsaras United States
Paolo Carloni Italy
Feng Gai relative to Reinhard Schweitzer‐Stenner United States Reinhard Schweitzer‐Stenner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Reinhard Schweitzer‐Stenner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Gai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Gai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Gai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Gai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Gai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Gai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Gai. The network helps show where Feng Gai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Gai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Gai Line = papers co-authored together Feng Gai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20252
3 20242
4 20219
5 20207
6 201922
7 201818
8 201813
9 201744
10 201616
11 20139
12 2011147
13 200723
14 20078
15 200639
16
Planning of the Classes of GUI Interface System Developed with Java
20051
17 2004164
18 2004180
19 2003135
20 2002187

About Feng Gai

Feng Gai is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biophysics, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, having authored 178 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (77 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (39 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (38 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (29 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (26 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (23 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (20 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.0k citations), Spectroscopy (1.6k citations), Biophysics (472 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k citations) and Molecular Biology (4.9k citations). Feng Gai has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include William F. DeGrado, Jacob W. Petrich, Cheng‐Yen Huang, Matthew J. Tucker, Ileana M. Pazos, Matthias M. Waegele, Deguo Du, Robert M. Culik, Zelleka Getahun and Pramit K. Chowdhury. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemistry, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026