Matthew J. Tucker
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Feng GaiRobin M. HochstrasserAyanjeet GhoshRolando OyolaEdward E. FenlonScott H. BrewerMatthias M. WaegeleAmos B. Smith
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (23 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (17 papers)Protein Structure and Dynamics (8 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPuerto Rico
In The Last Decade
Matthew J. Tucker
49 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Molecular Biology 835
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 633
- Spectroscopy 394
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 310
- Materials Chemistry 280
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew J. Tucker
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew J. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew J. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew J. Tucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew J. Tucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew J. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew J. Tucker. The network helps show where Matthew J. Tucker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew J. Tucker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew J. Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew J. Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew J. Tucker. Matthew J. Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 71 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 69 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | 59 |
About Matthew J. Tucker
Matthew J. Tucker is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Spectroscopy, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (23 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (17 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (394 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (633 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (165 citations). Matthew J. Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Feng Gai, Robin M. Hochstrasser, Ayanjeet Ghosh, Rolando Oyola, Edward E. Fenlon, Scott H. Brewer, Matthias M. Waegele, Amos B. Smith, Joel R. Courter and Deguo Du. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.