Felix Frankfurter

1.1k citations
24 papers · 90 indexed · h-index 6

Felix Frankfurter

19 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers

Felix Frankfurter
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Law 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 32
  • Economics and Econometrics 29
  • Public Administration 3
  • General Psychology 1
Replace Charles Fairman with:
Charles Fairman United States
Dumas Malone United States
Louis D. Brandeis
Stephen Halpern United States
André Tunc France
Ivor Jennings Germany
Wolfgang Κunkel Germany
Victoria Silver United Kingdom
Learned Hand
John Vile United States
Felix Frankfurter relative to Charles Fairman United States Charles Fairman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles Fairman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Frankfurter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Frankfurter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Frankfurter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Frankfurter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Frankfurter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Frankfurter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Frankfurter. The network helps show where Felix Frankfurter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Felix Frankfurter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Frankfurter Line = papers co-authored together Felix Frankfurter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Critical Analysis for Lawyers and Laymen
20032
2
The Felix Frankfurter papers
19863
3 19771
4 19761
5 19766
6
Mr. Justice Brandeis
19721
7 19698
8
James Bradley Thayer, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Felix Frankfurter on John Marshall
19671
9 19653
10 19631
11 19622
12 19625
13 19610
14
The legal conscience
19604
15
Personal recollections of Jonas S. Friedenwald.
19561
16 19564
17
Mr. Justice Roberts
19555
18 19559
19
Some observations on Supreme Court litigation and legal education
19541
20 19512

About Felix Frankfurter

Felix Frankfurter is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 24 papers that have together received 90 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (1 paper), International Arbitration and Investment Law (1 paper), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (32 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (29 citations). Felix Frankfurter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roscoe Pound, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Eugene V. Rostow, Felix S. Cohen, James Bradley Thayer, Eleanor Glueck, Robert Lindner, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Edwin Bidwell Wilson and Sheldon Glueck. Their work appears in journals such as Harvard Law Review, Stanford Law Review and Columbia Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026