Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency
1951318 citationsEdwin J. Lukas, Sheldon Glueck et al.Columbia Law Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Glueck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Glueck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Glueck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Glueck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Glueck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Glueck. The network helps show where Sheldon Glueck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheldon Glueck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheldon Glueck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheldon Glueck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sheldon Glueck. Sheldon Glueck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dinitz, Simon, Sheldon Glueck, & Eleanor Glueck. (1969). Delinquents and Nondelinquents in Perspective. The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science. 60(4). 502–502.160 indexed citations
Geis, Gilbert, Sheldon Glueck, & Eleanor Glueck. (1966). Ventures in Criminology. The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science. 57(2). 187–187.11 indexed citations
Mannheim, Hermann, Eleanor Glueck, & Sheldon Glueck. (1963). Family Environment and Delinquency. The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science. 54(2). 206–206.3 indexed citations
Glueck, Sheldon. (1960). Ten Years of Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 51(3). 283.1 indexed citations
13.
McCord, William Maxwell, Sheldon Glueck, & Eleanor Glueck. (1960). Predicting Delinquency and Crime. Stanford Law Review. 13(1). 210–210.45 indexed citations
14.
Schuessler, Karl, Sheldon Glueck, & Eleanor Glueck. (1960). Predicting Delinquency and Crime.. American Sociological Review. 25(3). 437–437.2 indexed citations
15.
Glueck, Sheldon, et al.. (1958). Alexander Maconochie of Norfolk Island : a study of a pioneer in penal reform. Oxford University Press eBooks.21 indexed citations
16.
Glueck, Sheldon & Eleanor Glueck. (1953). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. 36(1-6). 56–59.1 indexed citations
17.
Timasheff, N. S. & Sheldon Glueck. (1952). Crime and Correction. The American Catholic Sociological Review. 13(3). 193–193.1 indexed citations
Glueck, Sheldon, et al.. (1951). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency.. American Sociological Review. 16(2). 264–264.69 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.